myiW Current Conditions and Forecasts Community Forums Buy and Sell Services
 
Hi guest · myAccount · Log in
 SearchSearch   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   RegisterRegister 
right wing supreme court right wing activism
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 18, 19, 20, 21, 22  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    iWindsurf Community Forum Index -> Politics, Off-Topic, Opinions
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
real-human



Joined: 02 Jul 2011
Posts: 13578
Location: on earth

PostPosted: Mon Jun 20, 2022 10:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-u4c18YKuOw


Rep. Pascrell Calls On Justice Clarence Thomas To Resign


Quote:
Rep. Bill Pascrell (D-N.J.) calls for Justice Clarence Thomas to resign amid allegations that his wife, Ginni Thomas, played a role in the January 6th insurrection. “Mr. Thomas cannot possibly seem as someone who is neutral in this situation,” Pascrell said.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GUDOf66X9f0


Sen. Whitehouse: Supreme Court Must Investigate Justice Thomas’s Jan. 6 Votes


Quote:
Democratic Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse is calling on Supreme Court Chief Justice Roberts to investigate after The Washington Post reported that Justice Clarence Thomas’s wife was in contact with Trump attorney John Eastman, who was pushing the plan for VP Mike Pence to fail to certify the 2020 election results.

_________________
when good people stay silent the right wing are the only ones heard.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
real-human



Joined: 02 Jul 2011
Posts: 13578
Location: on earth

PostPosted: Thu Jun 23, 2022 12:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

spot on pictures

Kavanaugh must recuse, he was one of the lawyers with Kenny Boy Starr on Bill sending it to impeachment on Bill Clinton taking 6 years ..

_________________
when good people stay silent the right wing are the only ones heard.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
real-human



Joined: 02 Jul 2011
Posts: 13578
Location: on earth

PostPosted: Fri Jun 24, 2022 11:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/justice-thomas-says-the-supreme-court-should-reconsider-rulings-that-protect-access-to-contraception-and-same-sex-marriage-as-the-court-overturns-roe-v-wade/ar-AAYPDpt?ocid=winp2sv1plus&cvid=fca613b2e6e94517881328c0a2bbeb6c


Justice Thomas says the Supreme Court should reconsider rulings that protect access to contraception and same-sex marriage as the court overturns Roe v. Wade

_________________
when good people stay silent the right wing are the only ones heard.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
real-human



Joined: 02 Jul 2011
Posts: 13578
Location: on earth

PostPosted: Sun Jun 26, 2022 2:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

spot on..... supreme court justices who lie under oath is impeachment

https://www.nbcnews.com/meet-the-press/video/aoc-impeachment-should-be-considered-if-supreme-court-justices-lied-during-confirmation-142860869563


AOC: Impeachment should be ‘considered’ if Supreme Court justices lied during confirmation


Quote:
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) says there must be consequences for Supreme Court justices who lie under oath during an exclusive interview with Meet the Press.

_________________
when good people stay silent the right wing are the only ones heard.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
real-human



Joined: 02 Jul 2011
Posts: 13578
Location: on earth

PostPosted: Sun Jun 26, 2022 8:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

spot on.... time to run for office....Samuel,

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/samuel-l-jackson-calls-out-clarence-thomas-for-leaving-interracial-marriage-off-list-of-targets/ar-AAYTknq?cvid=cb68591abc844885b38a8e0a456c30ba&ocid=winp2sv1plus


Samuel L. Jackson Calls Out Clarence Thomas for Leaving Interracial Marriage Off List of Targets


Quote:
Samuel L. Jackson is weighing in on the fallout around the Supreme Court's latest ruling.

The Academy Award honoree, 73, called out Justice Clarence Thomas' after Thomas suggested the court should reconsider other key decisions, including the 2015 case establishing the right to same-sex marriage, following the SCOTUS decision to overturn 1973's Roe v. Wade and the constitutional right to abortion.

"How's Uncle Clarence feeling about Overturning Loving v Virginia??!!" Jackson wrote Friday on Twitter, referring to the landmark 1967 ruling that found interracial marriage bans unconstitutional. Justice Thomas, 74, a Black man, has been married to wife Virginia Thomas, a white woman, since 1987.

RELATED: In Concurring Opinion, Justice Clarence Thomas Writes Court 'Should Reconsider' Rulings Legalizing Gay Marriage and Birth Control

Thomas, who was nominated by President George H. W. Bush as the second Black person to ever serve on the Supreme Court in 1991, wrote in a concurring opinion that SCOTUS should next "reconsider" the rulings that legalized birth control, sodomy and same-sex marriage.

"In future cases, we should reconsider all of this Court's substantive due process precedents, including Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell. Because any substantive due process decision is 'demonstrably erroneous,' ... we have a duty to 'correct the error' established in those precedents," he said.

_________________
when good people stay silent the right wing are the only ones heard.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
real-human



Joined: 02 Jul 2011
Posts: 13578
Location: on earth

PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2022 3:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

found this on a few STRONG founders viewpoints-Intent on religion. hope this is accurate.
_________________
when good people stay silent the right wing are the only ones heard.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
isobars



Joined: 12 Dec 1999
Posts: 20775

PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2022 5:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Let me guess: You're whining to yourself about the RvW reversal. It's real, REAL, REAL, REAL simple: Abortion is not mentioned in any way in the constitution. The original decision was based on politics, not the rules of constitutional or common law. This court simply corrected that flawed, baseless decision. The three justices who dissented this time based their position on feelings, ideology, and mob rule, with no reference in their arguments to ... you know ... the LAW. They don't comprehend that their job is to decide what the constitution says and means, not to legislate (as Sotomayor boasts of doing.)

Don't feel badly. The Leftstream media don't understand and/or lie about it also.

OTOH, you SHOULD feel badly about agreeing with them.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
swchandler



Joined: 08 Nov 1993
Posts: 10395

PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2022 6:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I guess that isobars hasn't thought much about women's rights, and why they are important to better than 50% of Americans.

Yet maybe, as an "originalist" on the US Constitution, it's OK to strip women of their rights. At the nation's founding, there was no mention at all in the Constitution about women having any rights.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mac



Joined: 07 Mar 1999
Posts: 17175
Location: Berkeley, California

PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2022 7:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Today’s decision on the Bremerton coach is even worse.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
J64TWB



Joined: 24 Dec 2013
Posts: 1685

PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2022 7:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yea you know what else is not in the constitution?

Fucking everything!
Asbestos laws
Space shuttle exhaust
Bicycles
Radio volume loudness
Electricity
Morning after Pills
Aspirin
Internet and cell phone laws
Nuclear subs
Dog euthanasia rights
Heart surgery anesthesia liability
Satellite trajectory rules
Moon landing rights
Plastic salad spinner deaths


Fuck off you freakazoid.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    iWindsurf Community Forum Index -> Politics, Off-Topic, Opinions All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 18, 19, 20, 21, 22  Next
Page 19 of 22

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

myiW | Weather | Community | Membership | Support | Log in
like us on facebook
© Copyright 1999-2007 WeatherFlow, Inc Contact Us Ad Marketplace

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group