myiW Current Conditions and Forecasts Community Forums Buy and Sell Services
 
Hi guest · myAccount · Log in
 SearchSearch   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   RegisterRegister 
Obama's Amazing effectiveness
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 24, 25, 26 ... 73, 74, 75  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    iWindsurf Community Forum Index -> Politics, Off-Topic, Opinions
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
MalibuGuru



Joined: 11 Nov 1993
Posts: 9300

PostPosted: Mon May 23, 2016 9:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

She postponed debates so no one knew about Bernie Sanders until it was too late.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mrgybe



Joined: 01 Jul 2008
Posts: 5180

PostPosted: Mon May 23, 2016 9:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Boggsy, You are in denial. However, there is good news for you. It's clear that the DOJ is just as corrupt under Lynch as it was under Holder. Hillary is safe! From today's WSJ.

A federal judge has now exposed how the Justice Department systematically deceived lower courts about the Administration’s conduct, and he has imposed unprecedented legal measures to attempt to sterilize this ethics rot. When 26 states sued to block the order in December 2014, Justice repeatedly assured Judge Hanen that the Department of Homeland Security would not start processing applications until February 2015 at the earliest. Two weeks after the injunction came down, in March, Justice was forced to admit that DHS had already granted or renewed more than 100,000 permits.

As a result, Judge Hanen ordered that any Washington-based Justice lawyer who “appears or seeks to appear” in any state or federal court in the 26 states must first attend a remedial ethics seminar on “candor to the court.” He also ordered Attorney General Loretta Lynch to prepare a “comprehensive plan” to prevent such falsification. Such extraordinary judicial oversight is usually reserved for companies with a pattern of corruption or racially biased police departments.

The misconduct he has unmasked should trouble Americans of all political persuasions. Prosecutors often abuse their powers in run-of-the-mill cases. But this is a constitutional challenge with major consequences for the separation of powers, and the deceit must have required the participation and coordination of dozens of political appointees and career lawyers. That suggests a serious institutional failure, not mere rogue actors.


Republic, meet banana.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
boggsman1



Joined: 24 Jun 2002
Posts: 9120
Location: at a computer

PostPosted: Mon May 23, 2016 9:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

In denial about what?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mrgybe



Joined: 01 Jul 2008
Posts: 5180

PostPosted: Mon May 23, 2016 10:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The role that WS played in promoting Hillary's victory.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
boggsman1



Joined: 24 Jun 2002
Posts: 9120
Location: at a computer

PostPosted: Mon May 23, 2016 10:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

mrgybe wrote:
The role that WS played in promoting Hillary's victory.

Victory? Is it over?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jp5



Joined: 19 May 1998
Posts: 3394
Location: OnUr6

PostPosted: Mon May 23, 2016 11:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

boggsman1 wrote:
mrgybe wrote:
The role that WS played in promoting Hillary's victory.

Victory? Is it over?


According to the DNC it is.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
swchandler



Joined: 08 Nov 1993
Posts: 10588

PostPosted: Mon May 23, 2016 12:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

A federal judge from Texas with a bias? What else is new.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mac



Joined: 07 Mar 1999
Posts: 17747
Location: Berkeley, California

PostPosted: Mon May 23, 2016 2:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Let's watch the case through to the final outcome. Congress routinely asks the Administration to do things, and then doesn't provide sufficient money. I can't imagine how the country could actually work if the administration didn't have some discretion in administering laws where there wasn't enough money to do all of the things that are present in Congressional mandates. That's pretty much what Obama's executive order did, despite the hysteria from the right.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pointster



Joined: 22 Jul 2010
Posts: 376

PostPosted: Mon May 23, 2016 2:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

mrgybe wrote:
Boggsy, You are in denial. However, there is good news for you. It's clear that the DOJ is just as corrupt under Lynch as it was under Holder. Hillary is safe! From today's WSJ.

A federal judge has now exposed how the Justice Department systematically deceived lower courts about the Administration’s conduct, and he has imposed unprecedented legal measures to attempt to sterilize this ethics rot. When 26 states sued to block the order in December 2014, Justice repeatedly assured Judge Hanen that the Department of Homeland Security would not start processing applications until February 2015 at the earliest. Two weeks after the injunction came down, in March, Justice was forced to admit that DHS had already granted or renewed more than 100,000 permits.

As a result, Judge Hanen ordered that any Washington-based Justice lawyer who “appears or seeks to appear” in any state or federal court in the 26 states must first attend a remedial ethics seminar on “candor to the court.” He also ordered Attorney General Loretta Lynch to prepare a “comprehensive plan” to prevent such falsification. Such extraordinary judicial oversight is usually reserved for companies with a pattern of corruption or racially biased police departments.

The misconduct he has unmasked should trouble Americans of all political persuasions. Prosecutors often abuse their powers in run-of-the-mill cases. But this is a constitutional challenge with major consequences for the separation of powers, and the deceit must have required the participation and coordination of dozens of political appointees and career lawyers. That suggests a serious institutional failure, not mere rogue actors.


Republic, meet banana.


Except that the 100,000 cases cited were processed under the original 2012 DACA, not on the basis of the 2014 DACA expansion. The 2012 DACA was not enjoined by the judge in this case. The government is still not accepting applications for expanded DACA or DAPA, and will not unless the Supreme Court finds for the federal government.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mac



Joined: 07 Mar 1999
Posts: 17747
Location: Berkeley, California

PostPosted: Mon May 23, 2016 3:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

A Clinton hater, quick on the trigger and wrong? Who'da thought?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    iWindsurf Community Forum Index -> Politics, Off-Topic, Opinions All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 24, 25, 26 ... 73, 74, 75  Next
Page 25 of 75

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

myiW | Weather | Community | Membership | Support | Log in
like us on facebook
© Copyright 1999-2007 WeatherFlow, Inc Contact Us Ad Marketplace

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group