| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
real-human
Joined: 02 Jul 2011
Posts: 14892
Location: on earth
|
 Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2023 3:16 am Post subject: |
 |
|
Turns out Special prosecutors office got a supeana with a keep quiet provision to get all trump twitter data. But Twitter went to court to stop this and to argue he could notify trump it was issued.
But the Judge who in DC asked why this person should get special treatement when she had seen hundreds of her supenaona s to twitter followed without twitter ever coming to court to protest. She asked for one example in the pst and twitter lawyers had no such example. She asked if they owner had a special relationship with twitter owner. Obviously there was one, i mean why else woul he be trying to tip trump off.
One prosecutor noted they did these all the time including getting unset messages and all dms with locations and devices sending them. That they would see changes from that point to later when lawyers would tell them that their accounts would be given to prosecutors and the prosecutor said they would later again see what was on there and now gone to show criminal intent.
So anyway twitter ended up being fined by that dc judge ofr not giving an example and so on ie delaying it as the prosecution wanted these for some timely filing.
Also it was found twitter was slowing clicks to cites elon appears not to like like liberal media to stop people from going there for information. This was just released and miraculously those cites are no longer being in essence blocked.
https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/canada/elon-musk-s-x-slowing-down-traffic-to-websites-he-dislikes/ar-AA1flXaa
Elon Musk's X slowing down traffic to websites he dislikes
| Quote: | The company formerly known as Twitter has been slowing the speed with which users could access links to the New York Times, Facebook and other news organizations and online competitors, a move that appeared targeted at companies that have drawn the ire of owner Elon Musk.
Users who clicked a link on Musk’s website, now called X, for one of the targeted websites were made to wait about five seconds before seeing the page, according to tests conducted Tuesday by The Washington Post.
These Things Are Considered 'Normal' In Brazil
These Things Are Considered 'Normal' In Brazil
Ad
Investing Magazine
The delayed websites included X’s online rivals Facebook, Instagram, Bluesky and Substack, as well as the Reuters wire service and the Times. All of them have previously been singled out by Musk for ridicule or attack.
Flashing 'X' sign on roof of Twitter HQ draws ire of neighbours, city officials
Musk says his cage fight with Zuckerberg will be streamed on X
On Tuesday afternoon, hours after this story was first published, X began reversing the throttling on some of the sites, dropping the delay times back to zero. It was unknown if all the throttled websites had normal service restored.
The delay affected the t.co domain, a link-shortening service that X uses to process every link posted to the website. Traffic is routed through the domain, allowing X to track – and, in this case, throttle – activity to the target website, potentially taking away traffic and ad revenue from businesses Musk personally dislikes.
The Post’s analysis found that links to most other sites were unaffected – including those to The Washington Post, Fox News and social media services such as Mastodon and YouTube – with the shortened links being routed to their final destination in a second or less. A user first flagged the delays early Tuesday on the technology discussion forum Hacker News.
Musk, a self-described “free speech absolutist,” did not respond to requests for comment. X also did not respond. Some of the targeted businesses said they were reviewing the matter when contacted Tuesday by The Post.
Charlie Stadtlander, a spokesman for the Times, said in a statement that the news outlet has “made similar observations of our own” about the systemic delays and “not received any explanation from the platform about this move.”
“While we don’t know the rationale behind the application of this time delay, we would be concerned by targeted pressure applied to any news organization for unclear reasons,” he said.
Substack’s co-founders Chris Best, Hamish McKenzie and Jairaj Sethi said in a statement to The Post that they urged X to reverse the decision instituting a delay on Substack links. |
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/musk-withheld-twitter-data-to-cozy-up-to-trump-judge-suggests/ar-AA1fm7zA?ocid=winp2fptaskbarhover&cvid=d3c4367abcee4805939c6d4e0b744479&ei=25
Musk Withheld Twitter Data to 'Cozy Up' to Trump, Judge Suggests
_________________
when good people stay silent the right wing are the only ones heard. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
real-human
Joined: 02 Jul 2011
Posts: 14892
Location: on earth
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 01, 2023 7:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
and as I had guessed he works to help the Russians...
Elon Musk’s Changes to Twitter Helped Spread Russian Propaganda: EU
| Quote: |
Under Elon Musk, Twitter’s policies allowed Russian propaganda about Ukraine to run wild on the platform and spread to more users than before the war began, according to a study released this week by the European Commission. “Over the course of 2022, the audience and reach of Kremlin-aligned social media accounts increased substantially all over Europe,” the study states. “Preliminary analysis suggests that the reach and influence of Kremlin-backed accounts has grown further in the first half of 2023, driven in particular by the dismantling of Twitter’s safety standards.” The European Union’s research concluded that if its social media law, the Digital Services Act, had been enforced last year, Twitter would have violated it by permitting the spread of misinformation and hate speech. Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram, was also found to have helped boost Russian extremists and propagandists, according to the study. The EU is now cracking down on false information on social media, requiring companies to be subjected to auditing and stop their algorithms from spreading hateful content. |
_________________
when good people stay silent the right wing are the only ones heard. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
real-human
Joined: 02 Jul 2011
Posts: 14892
Location: on earth
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 15, 2023 12:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/twitter-turned-over-at-least-32-direct-messages-from-trump-s-account-to-special-counsel/ar-AA1gMiFY?cvid=01217e31c40441a3a53a280a785da0a1&ocid=winp2fptaskbarhover&ei=68
Twitter turned over at least 32 direct messages from Trump’s account to special counsel
| Quote: | Twitter turned over at least 32 direct messages from the former President Donald Trump’s account to special counsel Jack Smith earlier this year as part of the federal election subversion investigation, according to newly unsealed court filings.
The detail of what prosecutors obtained with a search warrant issued to the social media platform was revealed in a brief submitted under seal in May to the US Circuit Court of Appeals in Washington, DC.
Twitter – now known as “X” – was appealing a judge’s ruling that sanctioned the company for its delay in turning over the records from Trump’s account.
This story is breaking and will be updated. |
_________________
when good people stay silent the right wing are the only ones heard. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
real-human
Joined: 02 Jul 2011
Posts: 14892
Location: on earth
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
real-human
Joined: 02 Jul 2011
Posts: 14892
Location: on earth
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2023 11:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
what a piece of trash Elon is.......
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/companies/elon-musk-s-newest-defamation-lawsuit-highlights-x-s-toxicity/ar-AA1ky2F2?cvid=4f6759bee21546678da4378b1721a5c4&ocid=winp2fptaskbar&ei=7
Elon Musk's newest defamation lawsuit highlights X's toxicity
| Quote: |
Once again, Elon Musk, the owner of the platform X, is facing a defamation lawsuit. And once again one has to ask: What is this man doing running one of the most influential social media platforms in the world?
One day in June, Ben Brody, who had just graduated from college, started receiving odd texts from his friends. They said there was a rumor circulating online that he was an undercover federal agent who was trying to provoke fights between brawling neo-Nazi groups in Oregon. Sitting at home in California, the confused Brody initially thought it was all a prank.
It wasn’t. Unbeknownst to Brody, online sleuths had been searching for the identity of an unmasked participant in a skirmish that had recently broken out between two far-right groups near a Pride Night near Portland. Some of the self-appointed investigators had mistakenly identified Brody as the unmasked man in a video, and after delving into Brody’s publicly biographical information — indicating that he was a college student who said he was interested in working in government — they surmised that he was an undercover “fed” and agent provocateur.
It’s bad enough to be the subject of an online mob’s false conspiracy theory. It’s worse when one of the most influential men in the world seems to cosign that theory. On X, Musk responded encouragingly to multiple posts making speculative or false claims about Brody. Even after Brody had posted a video with evidence that he had been in California when the fight occurred, Musk suggested he believed Brody was in Oregon and likely part of some kind of operation. “Looks like one is a college student (who wants to join the govt) and another is maybe an Antifa member,” he wrote. “But nonetheless a probable false flag situation.” Musk also tagged “Community Notes,” a feature on X that allows users to append notes to posts that are intended to add context to or fact-check widely circulated posts.
They're the ones making claims that they are prevent or
Musk, who is followed by over 150 million users, turbocharged the online mob. Brody said was doxxed and harassed, and, at one point, he left his home with his mother out of concern for their safety. Brody is suing Musk for making “reckless” claims about him that damaged his reputation and endangered him. “Musk’s personal endorsement of the false accusation against Ben Brody reverberated across the internet, transforming the accusation from anonymous rumor to gospel truth for many individuals, and causing others to use Musk’s endorsement to justify their desire to harass Ben Brody and his family,” Brody’s lawsuit says. (Musk’s attorney told CNN that “we expect this case to be dismissed.”)
Whether or not Musk violated the law, it is clear he acted irresponsibly. Musk knows that he is, by many measures, one of the most influential people in the world and that his commentary encourages tribal reactions among his followers. Rather than ignore or express skepticism toward a group of amateur detectives online who were whipping up an online mob around a 22-year-old, Musk instead lent it his tremendous power and did nothing to counteract the wave of hatred — and awkward Google search results — that immediately crashed on Brody.
Musk’s behavior wasn't only personally irresponsible; it was yet another sign that he is precisely the wrong kind of person to helm a social media company. Musk has already shown on many occasions that he isn’t the champion of free speech that he claimed to be before purchasing the company. But on top of that, he also shows disregard for the idea of fostering meaningful speech. One way to encourage meaningful speech is to take reasonable measures to mitigate the spread of misinformation. Instead, Musk has systematically dismantled any such safeguards during his tenure at X. He scrapped the verified badges that allowed users to confirm accounts’ identities; disbanded the company' trust and safety teams; stripped (or selectively enforced) badges meant to show whether accounts were government-affiliated, thus hurting users’ ability to sniff out propaganda; and eagerly reactivated previously banned right-wing troll accounts that thrive on spreading false rumors (while seemingly suppressing left-leaning accounts). Musk's handling of the Brody incident also modeled a kind of behavior that encourages the spread of life-altering misinformation about private citizens.
Musk is creating an online space most hospitable to bullies and merchants of misinformation. That’s not only civically deplorable, but it’s also bad for business. X’s value has already dropped precipitously since he bought it last year; making it a place where even its owner encourages harassment of random users isn’t going to make fleeing advertisers any more likely to consider coming back.
Regardless of whether Brody succeeds against Musk — who has won defamation lawsuits before — Musk should re-evaluate the kind of reckless, society-corroding behavior he’s encouraging on his platform. I’m not optimistic that’s going to happen.
This article was originally published on |
_________________
when good people stay silent the right wing are the only ones heard. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
real-human
Joined: 02 Jul 2011
Posts: 14892
Location: on earth
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2023 3:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
owner of twitter posts fake news, that is how stupid he is.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LIkbiowK1kY
Fake news-prone Musk embraces another debunked conspiracy theory
| Quote: | Alex Wagner reports on how Elon Musk has stumbled from associating himself with a racist, antisemitic conspiracy theory that damaged the business and image of the former Twitter platform he owns to resurrecting a debunked conspiracy theory that in the past led to someone attacking a pizza shop with an AR-15-style rifle.
|
_________________
when good people stay silent the right wing are the only ones heard. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
real-human
Joined: 02 Jul 2011
Posts: 14892
Location: on earth
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2024 10:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
amazing Elons name in German means misery.... ain't that the truth... not sure why they would want to destroy a factory specially of electric cars? Maybe they know more about Musk than we do.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/companies/elon-musk-s-german-tesla-plant-suffers-close-to-1-billion-in-damages-after-attack-by-the-dumbest-eco-terrorists-on-earth/ar-BB1jqywI?cvid=197f9f8c70e745a581cfda4f475a1d07&ocid=winp2fptaskbar&ei=35&sc=shoreline
Elon Musk’s German Tesla plant suffers close to $1 billion in damages after attack by the ‘dumbest eco-terrorists on Earth’
| Quote: |
Arsonists calling themselves the Volcano Group left Tesla’s German factory without electricity on Tuesday, leading to damages the company claims could approach $1 billion.
More than 60,000 residents in Brandenburg and even parts of Berlin were also affected when a single high-voltage power mast near Tesla’s factory in Grünheide was set ablaze, raising broader questions over how to protect defenseless infrastructure critical to the economy from vandals, saboteurs and criminals.
"The complete destruction of the Gigafactory and the lopping off of technofascists like 'Elend' Musk are a step on the path towards liberation from the patriarchy," the group said in a statement sent to media, using a wordplay for Musk's first name that in German means "misery".
The plant's senior director Andre Thierig estimated the economic loss to Tesla from the production stop and subsequent ramp-up in the “high hundreds of millions” of euros as some 1,000 vehicles each day cannot be built.
His factory, the company’s first in Europe, manufactures the Model Y crossover for most European left-hand drive markets including Germany.
Emergency power still requires the local substation, which converts electricity into useful lower voltages, to still be connected with the rest of the grid.
The attack, however, severed the lines between the mast and the substation situated an hour’s drive east of downtown Berlin, causing backup systems to fail. |
_________________
when good people stay silent the right wing are the only ones heard. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
real-human
Joined: 02 Jul 2011
Posts: 14892
Location: on earth
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2024 3:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ya he is not a right winger, BS... and telling his employees how to vote...
Funny he calls a person a sorros backed... like Sorros has the influence or money of the worlds largest media and richest man in the US or world does anyone in the right wing controlled media point this out...
https://www.msn.com/en-us/autos/other/elon-musk-urges-tesla-employees-to-vote-out-austin-s-soros-backed-da-report/ar-BB1jobWF?ocid=winp2fptaskbar&cvid=7533b967611c40649dd94e40939b08d1&ei=52
Elon Musk urges Tesla employees to vote out Austin's Soros-backed DA: report
| Quote: | Tesla CEO Elon Musk worked to rally Austin, Texas, voters to oust the county's George Soros-backed District Attorney Jose Garza on Super Tuesday, and reportedly even urged his own employees at the electric vehicle giant's headquarters in the area to pull the lever for a candidate that will "actually prosecute crimes."
Musk took to his social media platform X Tuesday morning, calling on voters in the greater Austin area to "please go to the polls and vote for a new" Travis County DA, sharing a post from Garza's primary challenger, fellow Democrat Jeremy Sylestine.
Elon Musk, CEO of SpaceX and Tesla and owner of Twitter, looks on as he attends the Viva Technology conference dedicated to innovation and startups at the Porte de Versailles exhibition centre in Paris, France, June 16, 2023. REUTERS/Gonzalo Fuentes
Elon Musk, CEO of SpaceX and Tesla and owner of Twitter, looks on as he attends the Viva Technology conference dedicated to innovation and startups at the Porte de Versailles exhibition centre in Paris, France, June 16, 2023.
Garza took office in deep blue Travis County in 2021 after a campaign backed by progressive billionaire Soros, pledging to "reimagine" criminal justice and prosecute police officers.
But Garza's critics — including Sylestine, who previously worked in Garza’s office before starting his own practice — argue that Garza’s office has not advocated for victims of crime and has promoted policies that make the city less safe.
In making his case on X Tuesday, Sylestine emphasized that "More than anything else, the story I am trying to tell is that the promise of standing with victims and survivors has not been met," by Garza's office.
AUSTIN ‘AT THE BRINK OF DISASTER’ AS POLICE SHORTAGES HIT CRISIS LEVEL: ‘GOD HELP US ALL’
"The stories we're bringing forward including domestic violence and child abuse cases ending in poor results are real," Sylestine wrote. "They are horrifying stories."
Sylestine also pointed to a backlog of 6,000 cases that had accumulated under Garza and accused the DA of "run[ing] off 75 experienced felony prosecutors" on his watch.
Garza has defended his record as district attorney, saying that he is "doing exactly what Travis County voters elected him to do, fixing our broken criminal justice system by standing with survivors, working to end the excessive use of force by police, and prioritizing treatment over incarceration for nonviolent drug offenses." |
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/it-s-not-money-that-elon-musk-is-contributing-to-donald-trump/ar-BB1jrGFh?ocid=winp2fptaskbarhover&cvid=40da810c19724abe884af58c950f4a25&ei=20
It’s not money that Elon Musk is contributing to Donald Trump
| Quote: | News that Elon Musk met with Donald Trump over the weekend prompted not gasps of surprise but, instead, the sort of “oh, sure, of course” response that comes from figuring out a mystery story written for children. Naturally, Trump and Musk are sitting down. They are fundamentally the same character, with Musk trailing Trump’s evolution from business guy to right-wing political actor by about a decade.
Not to mention that Musk has two things that Trump very much wants: money and a slice of the national conversation. The New York Times’s original report about the meeting focused on the mechanics of the former, on whether Trump would get Musk to contribute to his campaign, super PAC, legal bills or whatever. But it is the other asset that Musk might provide that’s more interesting and more attainable.Sign up for How To Read This Chart, a weekly data newsletter from Philip Bump
Musk has already ruled out contributing to Trump’s campaign, writing on his social media site, X, that he was “not donating money to either candidate for US President.” There was little question that he was about to donate to President Biden, someone who on Tuesday he alleged had committed “treason” because … the president implemented a plan he announced in early 2023. And it’s very much in keeping with Musk’s uncomplicated persona that he would preemptively rule out aid to Trump.
Related video: Elon Musk’s Emails Are Published by OpenAI (Dailymotion)
Let’s say that all Musk had to offer was money. The worst way for Trump to secure it would be to sit Musk down and try to woo him, to bring him into the fold.
Musk, as has been robustly demonstrated very publicly over the past 16 months or so, insists upon convincing himself that he has discovered the answers on which he eventually lands. He is the archetype of the guy who “does his own research,” meaning he is the archetype of the guy who seizes on contrarian arguments that others have put forward. The 2024 Republican candidate who manifested this energy — an energy that is inseparable from hyperattentiveness to the online conversation — was Vivek Ramaswamy. And, true to form, Musk repeatedly expressed approval of Ramaswamy’s candidacy.
Musk doesn’t want Trump to be able to say that the Tesla CEO is on his team. Musk wants to be able to frame Trump as being on his. Just as he was able to get Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) to announce his presidential candidacy on X or Twitter or whatever it was called in May. Just like Musk similarly played host to Ramaswamy in an online conversation (with not-terribly-helpful results). Musk wants to be in a position of power, and he seems dissatisfied with the power that comes from having lots of money.
None of this (including his social media post) means that Musk won’t eventually donate to Trump. It just means that straight-up asking probably isn’t the play.
Nor does this mean that Musk won’t contribute to Trump in other ways. In fact, he contributes on a daily basis, amplifying fringe-right rhetoric about immigration that makes Trump’s stated positions seem less extreme and that propagate out to millions of X users.
On Feb. 2, for example, Musk claimed that Biden was “encouraging” illegal immigration so that he could “[l]egalize them to create a permanent majority” of Democratic voters. It is an explicit articulation of the “great replacement theory,” and one that bears no relationship to reality.
The research he’d conducted to demonstrate that this was Biden’s plan included an image of an Associated Press article headlined “Biden to prioritize legal status for millions of immigrants.” This was not a recent article but one from the transition period before Biden took office. The article reported that Biden would introduce legislation on his first day in office that provided a path to citizenship. And he did. And it went nowhere. And that was that. But here comes Elon Musk, perpetually incensed by hyperbolic or false claims about immigrants arriving in the United States, picking up this three-year-old story.
His post has been viewed 48 million times, according to X’s dubious metrics. It has been reposted 76,000 times. Maybe Biden should have just included Tesla in his electric-vehicle summit.
Musk purchased then-Twitter in part because, he argued, he opposed the social media platform’s approach to moderating content. Like many on the right, he conflated rules limiting toxic behavior and misinformation with limits on right-wing speech. Musk insisted that Twitter should become a “free speech” zone, by which he didn’t really mean that anyone could say anything so much as he meant that his viewpoints and the viewpoints of his ideological allies should be unfettered. This overlaps almost entirely with the “do your own research” worldview, in which even wrong or harmful arguments must necessarily be granted oxygen.
And why were those rules in place? Largely because, in 2016, the tactic of using the internet to bully and harass ideological opponents spilled over into social media in force. Those voices were often right-wing and heavily pro-Trump. Twitter, at that point, became a way for pro-Trump voices to organize, coordinate and engage in unified action. Twitter implemented controls, and then Musk lifted those controls. The benefits to Trump are apparent. DeSantis’s presidential campaign hoped to leverage the positive sentiment he had earned from voices on the right when he sought reelection as governor in 2022. But he quickly ran into the established, potent, pro-Trump buzz saw that existed in right-wing social media.
Trump, facing legal bills, legal penalties, campaign costs and who knows what else, could use some cash. Extracting $3,300 from Musk wouldn’t do much to fill that hole and would require a careful appeal to the businessman. But Musk is already contributing far more than $3,300 in value to Trump’s campaign by spreading extreme right-wing rhetoric that reinforces Trump’s political arguments.
Intentionally or not, Musk is actively engaged in organizing in support of Trump on his platform of hundreds of millions of users. Any monetary donation is icing on the cake. |
_________________
when good people stay silent the right wing are the only ones heard. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
real-human
Joined: 02 Jul 2011
Posts: 14892
Location: on earth
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 13, 2024 5:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
this waco is not about being balanced. another pathological liar. he opened the gate to russian and chinese ai trolls.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/news/elon-musk-slams-aoc-after-ny-rep-makes-election-interference-allegations-about-x-i-made-the-algorithm-open-source-and-neutral/ar-BB1jN74H?ocid=winp2fptaskbar&cvid=a4ab6a8757b94fd8ecfa5dd4e24772fa&ei=31
Elon Musk Slams AOC After NY Rep Makes 'Election Interference' Allegations About X: 'I Made The Algorithm Open Source And Neutral'
| Quote: | Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk has responded to allegations of “election interference” made by Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) in a classified briefing attended by officials from the Biden Justice Department on Tuesday, according to a report.
What Happened: The information about the briefing was shared by Tucker Carlson, conservative media personality and former Fox News host.
He took to X, formerly Twitter, and said that during this classified briefing AOC accused Musk of election interference in the 2022 midterms by altering the algorithms on the social media platform he acquired in October of the same year.
“Not coincidentally, the anti-TikTok legislation now being debated on the Hill would allow the federal government to force the sale of any social media platform that interferes in elections. Just so you know what's coming in 2025,” Carlson posted.
See Also: Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang Thinks Even Free AI Chips From Rivals Are ‘Not Cheap Enough’ Compared To Its GPUs
Musk responded to these reported allegations, stating, “Actually, I made the algorithm open source and neutral to all parties, but of course that *is* ‘election interference’ by her standards.”
Why It Matters: This is not the first time Musk has been involved in a controversy related to election interference or integrity.
In a podcast appearance in November 2023, he highlighted X’s goal to be fair and provide a level playing field for all sides in the 2024 Presidential election. At the time, he also said that in the past, the platform was “controlled by far-left activists,” and did not offer a level playing field to everyone.
Moreover, last month he accused Mark Zuckerberg-led Meta Platforms of using “election integrity” as a guise for censorship. “‘Election Integrity’ at Meta is just their word for censorship,” he said then.
Musk’s response to Ocasio-Cortez’s reported allegations comes amid ongoing discussions about anti-TikTok legislation. The bill approved by the House Energy Committee last Thursday mandates that any company found to be under the control of a foreign adversary must undergo divestment within 180 days. It specifically targets ByteDance and TikTok.
Photos via Shutterstock |
_________________
when good people stay silent the right wing are the only ones heard. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
real-human
Joined: 02 Jul 2011
Posts: 14892
Location: on earth
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum
|
|
|
Search
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Register
