wap vs app wind readings different

[shreddbob]

Another vote for WAP here.
Please, please keep WAP going as long as possible. Years ago I was told by Phil A. that I needed to pay a ($40?) premium so I would retain access to WAP. The loyal WAP users were helping defray the cost to keep those old WAP servers running. Then later it turned out that I could just make my membership level "Gold" and that covered WAP access. I don't really need Gold level, but have been paying the $159 price for years just to keep accessing WAP. As others have said, it's the best method in low signal areas, due to simple graphics and no ads. Plus, I value the 3 hour history of wind direction (in degrees) that only WAP provides.
Long live the WAP!

[charliegrist]

Hey Mike Godsey: How do I find the pressure reports on the new web site or the mobile app? I find them on the Classic - which is why I keep using that. But I can't find the pressure reports elsewhere. Need them.

[isobars]

Absolutely. They're not flawless (largely because of microgradients), but they contribute significantly to deciding whether to make the drive, whether and what to rig, etc.