myiW Current Conditions and Forecasts Community Forums Buy and Sell Services
 
Hi guest · myAccount · Log in
 SearchSearch   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   RegisterRegister 
Chinook Hydroshok, North Shox
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    iWindsurf Community Forum Index -> Windsurfing Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
beaglebuddy



Joined: 10 Feb 2012
Posts: 1120

PostPosted: Wed Feb 15, 2017 2:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

North claims their base and tendon when used with their Euro pin is actually the shortest base but you are right the tube hanging below the extension on the shox adds several inches, that part moves up and down.


ibased.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  21.83 KB
 Viewed:  11733 Time(s)

ibased.jpg


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kevinkan



Joined: 07 Jun 2001
Posts: 1661
Location: San Francisco

PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2017 8:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

swchandler wrote:
Definitely a bit different than the norm. It might be just an illusion, but the distance from the bottom of the black plastic cuff of the extension to the deck of the board appears to be greater than a standard Chinook universal, especially since the separation component (Euro-pin or US pinned) is usually incorporated as part of the extension's cuff assembly.


Yes, it has to be... that's what gives you the travel suspension range. I don't think there's anyway around it, but maybe somebody will think of something?

I didn't measure how low profile the North Uni was before I shipped it to beaglebuddy, but it seemed low profile with a low bend point.

FWIW, the Streamlined Euro Pin uni I just measured puts the bottom of the mast extension about 3.25" above the deck of the board with a bend point (mid tendon) ~1.9" from the deck of the board.

_________________
Kevin Kan
Sunset Sailboards, San Francisco CA
http://www.sunsetsailboards.com
https://www.instagram.com/sunsetsailboards
http://www.facebook.com/sunsetsailboards
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
swchandler



Joined: 08 Nov 1993
Posts: 10588

PostPosted: Fri Feb 17, 2017 8:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Maybe the lower position of the tendon is meaningful, but I still have to question the fact that the sail is going to be higher off the deck making it a little more difficult to efficiently endplate the foot of the sail. Like you say though, the shock travel needs the added distance to operate. I guess the proof of the concept relies on the compliance and dampening of the rig gained in action on the water. It will be interesting to hear back from beaglebuddy after he has had some time to test it out in rougher water.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
beaglebuddy



Joined: 10 Feb 2012
Posts: 1120

PostPosted: Fri Feb 17, 2017 11:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hardly an difference in height with this tendon base.


unname9.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  151.31 KB
 Viewed:  11641 Time(s)

unname9.jpg


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
beaglebuddy



Joined: 10 Feb 2012
Posts: 1120

PostPosted: Fri Feb 17, 2017 11:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The center of the pulley wheel is 3/4" higher on the North but that is because the pulley wheel on this Chinook carbon extension hangs down below the flat area on the bottom of the extension where the US cup inserts.
The difference is 3/4" but there is no load on the shox.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
beaglebuddy



Joined: 10 Feb 2012
Posts: 1120

PostPosted: Fri Feb 17, 2017 11:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

3/4"


unnamed10.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  89.26 KB
 Viewed:  11638 Time(s)

unnamed10.jpg


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kevinkan



Joined: 07 Jun 2001
Posts: 1661
Location: San Francisco

PostPosted: Wed Feb 22, 2017 4:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

swchandler wrote:
Maybe the lower position of the tendon is meaningful, but I still have to question the fact that the sail is going to be higher off the deck making it a little more difficult to efficiently endplate the foot of the sail. Like you say though, the shock travel needs the added distance to operate. I guess the proof of the concept relies on the compliance and dampening of the rig gained in action on the water. It will be interesting to hear back from beaglebuddy after he has had some time to test it out in rougher water.


That extra distance will diminished some by sail load on the suspension parts and also by sail rake angle. 3/4" difference is pretty small, but it is also compared to a Chinook setup... their unis tend to be higher profile, and their extensions also have the pulley wheels drop fairly low... so not sure what the tradeoff is in terms of rig height off the top of the deck. Perhaps the lowest would be a North or Streamlined standard uni w/ a Chinook extension? Streamlined extensions also get the pulleys really low.

I'm using the North Power.XT 2.0 extension right now, and it puts the sail maybe 8-10mm higher than my previous extensions (North Uni.XT and Streamlined Redline RDM)

_________________
Kevin Kan
Sunset Sailboards, San Francisco CA
http://www.sunsetsailboards.com
https://www.instagram.com/sunsetsailboards
http://www.facebook.com/sunsetsailboards
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
swchandler



Joined: 08 Nov 1993
Posts: 10588

PostPosted: Wed Feb 22, 2017 8:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

From what I can tell, the universal used in conjunction with beaglebuddy's Chinook mast extension isn't a Chinook brand universal. Speaking for myself, most of my universals and RDM mast extensions are Chinook's Euro-pin design. My most used Chinook tendon type universals are the stainless steel ones with the single twist-on threaded attachment. They are a pretty low profile design. I'd measure one, but my van has been in the shop for 2 1/2 weeks.

I also have a Chinook stainless steel Euro-pin universal that mounts into Chinook's two screw base assembly. As I recollect, it's a bit higher profile overall. In addition, I still have some Streamlined SDM universals with the 2 pin cup too that I use with older Fiberspar carbon mast extensions (the absolute lightest mast extensions I've ever used). When I get my van back, I'll collect some measurements and post the results.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kevinkan



Joined: 07 Jun 2001
Posts: 1661
Location: San Francisco

PostPosted: Wed Feb 22, 2017 9:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

swchandler wrote:
From what I can tell, the universal used in conjunction with beaglebuddy's Chinook mast extension isn't a Chinook brand universal. Speaking for myself, most of my universals and RDM mast extensions are Chinook's Euro-pin design. My most used Chinook tendon type universals are the stainless steel ones with the single twist-on threaded attachment. They are a pretty low profile design. I'd measure one, but my van has been in the shop for 2 1/2 weeks.

I also have a Chinook stainless steel Euro-pin universal that mounts into Chinook's two screw base assembly. As I recollect, it's a bit higher profile overall. In addition, I still have some Streamlined SDM universals with the 2 pin cup too that I use with older Fiberspar carbon mast extensions (the absolute lightest mast extensions I've ever used). When I get my van back, I'll collect some measurements and post the results.


ah, you are right! i just looked at beaglebuddy's picture a little more closely. I did measure a couple unis on my desk: Chinook 2-bolt US Cup and Streamlined 2-Bolt US Cup.

the Chinook puts the extension 4" off the deck of the board
the Streamlined puts the extension 3.5" off the deck of the board.

you coming back up to the Bay Area this summer?

_________________
Kevin Kan
Sunset Sailboards, San Francisco CA
http://www.sunsetsailboards.com
https://www.instagram.com/sunsetsailboards
http://www.facebook.com/sunsetsailboards
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
swchandler



Joined: 08 Nov 1993
Posts: 10588

PostPosted: Thu Feb 23, 2017 3:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes, I'm planning on a couple trips up to the Delta. Hope to see you there.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    iWindsurf Community Forum Index -> Windsurfing Discussion All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You can attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum

myiW | Weather | Community | Membership | Support | Log in
like us on facebook
© Copyright 1999-2007 WeatherFlow, Inc Contact Us Ad Marketplace

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group