myiW Current Conditions and Forecasts Community Forums Buy and Sell Services
 
Hi guest · myAccount · Log in
 SearchSearch   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   RegisterRegister 
trumped up lawsuits or not
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    iWindsurf Community Forum Index -> Politics, Off-Topic, Opinions
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
real-human



Joined: 02 Jul 2011
Posts: 14838
Location: on earth

PostPosted: Thu Feb 09, 2017 2:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow/watch/trump-loses-case-to-cover-jr-s-failed-company-lawyer-lies-to-maddow-873204291897?cid=eml_mda_20170209


Maddow: Trump loses case to cover Donald Jr's failed company

Quote:
Rachel Maddow updates previous reporting on Donald Trump's attempt to use a legal loophole to shield his son from responsibilities associated with a failed business in South Carolina, with news that the ruling went against Trump, and Trump's lawyer is shown to have lied to The Rachel Maddow Show.

_________________
when good people stay silent the right wing are the only ones heard.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
real-human



Joined: 02 Jul 2011
Posts: 14838
Location: on earth

PostPosted: Tue Feb 28, 2017 5:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

hmmm this russian billionaire guy ex wife reports him as having orgies with very young girls... hmmm another good friend of trumps..

http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow/watch/new-commerce-secretary-at-nexus-of-lucrative-trump-russian-deal-886220355575?cid=eml_mra_20170228

New Commerce Secretary at nexus of lucrative Trump Russian deal

Quote:
With a line that runs through newly confirmed Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross, Rachel Maddow connects the dots between a billionaire Russian oligarch and a...




Donald Trump’s alleged Russian handler flies to Moscow, as Senate Intel Committee closes in


Quote:
Thanks to a pattern in which Russian operative Dmitry Rybolovlev has been curiously flying in on his private plane to whatever American city Donald Trump happens to be visiting at the time, including last weekend when Trump traveled to Mar-a-Lago in West Palm Beach, all eyes were on Rybolovlev this weekend to see whether he would once again surface in West Palm Beach. Instead, with the Senate Intelligence Committee suddenly closing in on Trump over Russia, Dmitry Rybolovlev suddenly flew to Moscow.

Real News. Fake President.

Although Rybolovlev is Russian, he primarily lives in Monaco, so traveling to Moscow is no small deal. Earlier we reported that he had flown in all the way from Switzerland last weekend in order to be in West Palm Beach at the same time as Donald Trump, as documented by political journalist Louise Mensch from Heat Street and others. But this weekend, even as Trump once again headed to West Palm Beach, Rybolovlev curiously went in the opposite direction.

Support the Palmer Report

According to the Huffngton Post, Rybolovlev flew to Moscow on Thursday for unknown reasons. Perhaps the increasing eyeballs on his conscious trips to West Palm Beach were drawing too much attention, and he decided not to meet with Trump this weekend. But there’s another theory.

_________________
when good people stay silent the right wing are the only ones heard.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
real-human



Joined: 02 Jul 2011
Posts: 14838
Location: on earth

PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2017 2:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

poster put up all over NY east village

again this was his words while married to present wife 3.

Quote:
“I did try and fuck her. She was married.

I moved on her like a bitch,

But I couldn’t get there.

And she was married.

You know I’m automatically attracted to beautiful.

I just start kissing them. It’s like a magnet. Just kiss.

I don’t even wait.

You can do anything…

Grab them by the pussy.

You can do anything.”

The President of the United States of America

_________________
when good people stay silent the right wing are the only ones heard.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
J64TWB



Joined: 24 Dec 2013
Posts: 1685

PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2017 4:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Easy there Dean. You're talking about the guy Bard worships, idolizes and teaches his daughters to fall in line with.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
real-human



Joined: 02 Jul 2011
Posts: 14838
Location: on earth

PostPosted: Mon Mar 27, 2017 1:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

hmm a student wants damages so the settlement is in jeopardy. Not just their money back, wants damages for fraud.

from the idiot who says he does not

http://money.cnn.com/2017/03/23/news/trump-university-settlement-claims/index.html?iid=ob_article_hotListpool

Thousands of Trump University students file to get their money back

Quote:
Thousands of former enrollees at Trump University are one step closer to getting back at least some of their money.
More than 3,700 of them have filed claims as part of last year's $25 million settlement agreed to by President Donald Trump, according to an attorney for the plaintiffs in the case. About 7,000 former students were eligible to submit claims, but the deadline to file was March 6.
If the court approves the settlement, former students are projected to receive back about 80% of the money they spent on live seminars or mentorships from the now-defunct, real estate education program, says Rachel Jensen, the class counsel for students nationwide.
The settlement brings the possible closure of three lawsuits that claimed Trump University defrauded students and threatened to drag Trump into court early into his presidency.
A court hearing will be held on March 30 to decide whether to approve the settlement, though one risk is a late challenge from a former student. Sherri B. Simpson of Ft. Lauderdale, Florida filed an objection to the settlement with U.S. District Judge Gonzalo Curiel in San Diego, where the cases have been consolidated.
Simpson, who says she spent about $20,000 on Trump University courses in 2010, told CNN she wants more from the President than just a portion of her money back.
"What he did to me and what he did to everybody else was really fraudulent and I'd really like to take him to trial. I'd like to hold him accountable," Simpson said.
Simpson said in addition to a refund and three times the amount she spent on the programs, she also wants an apology from President Trump.
John F. Banzhaf III, a law professor at George Washington University, said Simpson's objection could delay or even derail the settlement, because if the judge rules in her favor, the settlement would have to be adjusted to allow additional students to opt-out. If the judge rejects her argument, she could appeal.
"What she is doing could torpedo the settlement. If the court grants her request, it means she would be free to sue Donald Trump on her own," Banzhaf said.

Trump University is the defunct, for-profit real estate seminar business Trump launched in 2005. It promised to teach students investing techniques they could use to get rich in real estate -- just like Trump.
Some students ended up paying tens of thousands of dollars. While the initial Trump University seminar was free, teachers would then upsell them for another program. A "one-year apprenticeship," which was effectively a three-day seminar along with the phone number for a "client advisor," cost $1,495, according to court documents. A "mentorship" cost at least $10,000 and the most expensive, the "Gold Elite" program, cost $35,000.
Trump University effectively closed in 2010, the same year the New York Department of Education directed the program to stop operating without a license.
Was it a fraud? In advertisements, Trump said he "hand-picked" the instructors himself, but during a deposition, Trump did not remember a single instructor when a list of names was read. Lawsuits also argued the program was marketed as a university when it was not licensed.
The first of the three lawsuits was filed in 2010. Ultimately, there were two class action suits and a suit from the New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman.

Donald Trump agreed to settle on November 18, just 10 days after his victory. It saved the president from having to testify in a trial in San Diego.
The settlement is a complete turnaround from Trump's earlier position on the lawsuits. "This is a case I could have settled very easily, but I don't settle cases very easily when I'm right," he said in March 2016 at a Republican presidential debate.
"We are pleased to announce the complete resolution of all litigation involving Trump University," a Trump Organization spokesperson said at the time of the settlement.
"While we have no doubt that Trump University would have prevailed at trial based on the merits of this case, resolution of these matters allows President-Elect Trump to devote his full attention to the important issues facing our great nation."
Trump has remained defiant about the settlement, even suggesting in a Tweet in June he may re-open his shuttered school in the future. When the settlement was reached, then President-elect Trump tweeted: "I settled the Trump University lawsuit for a small fraction of the potential award because as President I have to focus on our country."
Felicisimo Limon, one of the former students who submitted a claim, told CNN he lost about $30,000 on real estate courses he called, "all lies."
Limon, a retired Navy veteran, and his wife attended a free seminar near San Francisco in 2008. He says Trump University representatives convinced him to pay thousands of dollars for seminars he later realized did not include any advanced real estate techniques.
"I am really happy there is a settlement. I was not looking forward to a court fight with Donald Trump," Limon told CNN on Monday.
Limon says he submitted a claim for $29,000 of more than $30,000 he believes he is owed.

_________________
when good people stay silent the right wing are the only ones heard.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
real-human



Joined: 02 Jul 2011
Posts: 14838
Location: on earth

PostPosted: Sun Apr 02, 2017 9:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hate talk to incite violence is not legal. Trump claims it is....

again he told his haters he would pay their defense. What more evidence does one need.




Judge to Trump: No protection for speech inciting violence


Quote:
A federal judge in Kentucky ruled that a lawsuit accusing President Trump of inciting violence against protesters last year can proceed. “It is plausible that Trump’s direction to ‘get ‘em out of here’ advocated the use of force,” the judge wrote.

_________________
when good people stay silent the right wing are the only ones heard.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MalibuGuru



Joined: 11 Nov 1993
Posts: 9293

PostPosted: Sun Apr 02, 2017 9:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

real-human wrote:
Hate talk to incite violence is not legal. Trump claims it is....

again he told his haters he would pay their defense. What more evidence does one need.




Judge to Trump: No protection for speech inciting violence


Quote:
A federal judge in Kentucky ruled that a lawsuit accusing President Trump of inciting violence against protesters last year can proceed. “It is plausible that Trump’s direction to ‘get ‘em out of here’ advocated the use of force,” the judge wrote.


Ahh, another incompetent liberal judge clutches his pearls. The violence at Trump's rallies was always instigated by the fascist left.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
real-human



Joined: 02 Jul 2011
Posts: 14838
Location: on earth

PostPosted: Sun Apr 02, 2017 9:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

MalibuGuru wrote:
real-human wrote:
Hate talk to incite violence is not legal. Trump claims it is....

again he told his haters he would pay their defense. What more evidence does one need.




Judge to Trump: No protection for speech inciting violence


Quote:
A federal judge in Kentucky ruled that a lawsuit accusing President Trump of inciting violence against protesters last year can proceed. “It is plausible that Trump’s direction to ‘get ‘em out of here’ advocated the use of force,” the judge wrote.


Ahh, another incompetent liberal judge clutches his pearls. The violence at Trump's rallies was always instigated by the fascist left.



what the F are you talking about... your hate just pours out or your pores. Tell me about that black man peacefully walking out and being blind sided smashed by a right wing waco. Remember the one trump said he would pay his legal bills. Turns out that guy who was not involved in anything just jumping out of the crowd to punch from behind on a peaceful walker was a defense contractor employee who had been convicted of vote fraud. He voted in two states in the same election....

_________________
when good people stay silent the right wing are the only ones heard.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mac



Joined: 07 Mar 1999
Posts: 17743
Location: Berkeley, California

PostPosted: Sun Apr 02, 2017 2:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

MalibuGuru wrote:
real-human wrote:
Hate talk to incite violence is not legal. Trump claims it is....

again he told his haters he would pay their defense. What more evidence does one need.




Judge to Trump: No protection for speech inciting violence


Quote:
A federal judge in Kentucky ruled that a lawsuit accusing President Trump of inciting violence against protesters last year can proceed. “It is plausible that Trump’s direction to ‘get ‘em out of here’ advocated the use of force,” the judge wrote.


Ahh, another incompetent liberal judge clutches his pearls. The violence at Trump's rallies was always instigated by the fascist left.


FASCISM is largely about supporting a strong man--Trump--over the messiness of democratic institutions. Like belittling the courts or Congress when they disagree. Trump and Bard are on board for that.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
real-human



Joined: 02 Jul 2011
Posts: 14838
Location: on earth

PostPosted: Fri Apr 07, 2017 10:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

what an abuse of power... trump is abusing government and the government is out of hand now...

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2017/04/06/the-government-is-demanding-to-know-who-this-trump-critic-is-twitter-is-suing-to-keep-it-a-secret/?utm_term=.66c577c552de&wpisrc=nl_headlines&wpmm=1

The government is demanding to know who this Trump critic is. Twitter is suing to keep it a secret.
Quote:

Twitter filed a lawsuit Thursday to block an order from the Department of Homeland Security that seeks to reveal the user of an account who has been critical of the Trump administration's immigration policies.

Tweets from the account -- @ALT_uscis -- indicate that it is run by someone who is an employee of the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services division of Homeland Security.

Free speech advocates said the DHS order appeared to be the first time the government has attempted to use its powers to expose an anonymous critic -- a development that, if successful, would have a "grave chilling effect on the speech of that account" as well as other accounts critical of the U.S. government, Twitter said.

[One thing Trump has stopped doing on Twitter since inauguration]

DHS is "unlawfully abusing a limited-purpose investigatory tool" to find out who is behind the @ALT_uscis account, according to Twitter's court filings.

DHS spokeswoman Jenny Burke declined to comment, citing the pending litigation.

The case sets up a potential showdown over free speech between Silicon Valley and Washington, which has tussled over whether tech firms can resist government orders seeking the identity or personal information from criminals and suspected terrorists.

Apple, for instance, declined in early 2016 to unlock the phone of the shooter in San Bernardino, Calif., and has refused to build "back doors" that would enable law enforcement to break into smartphones. The move sparked a pitched battle between the company and the FBI, which eventually paid a private expert to unlock the device.

But the Homeland Security case struck free speech advocates as more remarkable because the information request was about the identity of a government critic, rather than public safety.

_________________
when good people stay silent the right wing are the only ones heard.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    iWindsurf Community Forum Index -> Politics, Off-Topic, Opinions All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 2 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

myiW | Weather | Community | Membership | Support | Log in
like us on facebook
© Copyright 1999-2007 WeatherFlow, Inc Contact Us Ad Marketplace

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group