| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
mrgybe
Joined: 01 Jul 2008
Posts: 5180
|
 Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2015 11:52 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
| coboardhead wrote: | | If Hillary self destructs, I want one of the few non-nut jobs the GOP has to offer. |
Since you have stated that the large majority of the GOP candidates are "nut jobs", could you please let us know which of these merits that description. Kasich, Rubio, Bush, Christie, Fiorina, Jindal, Santorum, Huckabee, Cruz, Paul, Graham. I've left Carson and Trump off because you have previously dismissed them as clueless. Thank you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
swchandler
Joined: 08 Nov 1993
Posts: 10588
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2015 1:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
"Okay,,,,,,,,,, next."
How conveniently those on the right move on. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
coboardhead
Joined: 26 Oct 2009
Posts: 4303
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2015 9:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Mrgybe. Over in another thread, specifically for this subject, I have mentioned which candidates I believe are Presidential. Even though asked, repeatedly, by other posters, you have not. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mrgybe
Joined: 01 Jul 2008
Posts: 5180
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2015 10:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
| You see the danger of using silly, sweeping generalizations picked up from left wing media? Just as Carson is not "clueless", none of the candidates I listed are "nut-jobs" no matter how hard you try to rationalize your vote for Hillary. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
boggsman1
Joined: 24 Jun 2002
Posts: 9120
Location: at a computer
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2015 10:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
| mrgybe wrote: | | You see the danger of using silly, sweeping generalizations picked up from left wing media? Just as Carson is not "clueless", none of the candidates I listed are "nut-jobs" no matter how hard you try to rationalize your vote for Hillary. |
I disagree. I would say Santorum, Fiorina, and Huckabee are certainly Nut Jobs.
Yesterday The Donald said Obama is pressuring Yellen not to raise rates.....complete BS... Nut Job statement. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mrgybe
Joined: 01 Jul 2008
Posts: 5180
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2015 10:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Keep working on the refusal to grow up thing.........you are succeeding in that effort. If and when you ever do grow up, you will realize that reasonable people can have different views on important topics. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mac
Joined: 07 Mar 1999
Posts: 17747
Location: Berkeley, California
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2015 11:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Look up the word diplomacy. Maybe even try it on for size. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pointster
Joined: 22 Jul 2010
Posts: 376
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2015 1:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| mrgybe wrote: | | coboardhead wrote: | | If Hillary self destructs, I want one of the few non-nut jobs the GOP has to offer. |
Since you have stated that the large majority of the GOP candidates are "nut jobs", could you please let us know which of these merits that description. Kasich, Rubio, Bush, Christie, Fiorina, Jindal, Santorum, Huckabee, Cruz, Paul, Graham. I've left Carson and Trump off because you have previously dismissed them as clueless. Thank you. |
I don't think any you named are "nut-jobs", but I believe the soundest GOP candidates are Kasich, Bush, Christie, and Graham. I believe Graham has the best combination of experience, intellect and temperament. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nw30
Joined: 21 Dec 2008
Posts: 6485
Location: The eye of the universe, Cen. Cal. coast
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2015 1:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| swchandler wrote: | "Okay,,,,,,,,,, next."
How conveniently those on the right move on. |
As my old man used to always say, "pick your battles", I like to include "and how far you are willing to debate a brick wall". |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mrgybe
Joined: 01 Jul 2008
Posts: 5180
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 19, 2016 4:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
From today's WSJ:
UnitedHealth Group Inc. said it would remain in only a very small number of the Affordable Care Act’s marketplaces next year and suggested that it doesn’t currently see a way to run the business effectively. The biggest U.S. insurer will pare its presence from 34 states this year to “only a handful” in 2017, said Chief Executive Stephen J. Hemsley during the company’s first-quarter earnings conference call. Mr. Hemsley said that the “smaller overall market size and shorter-term, higher-risk profile within this market segment continue to suggest we cannot broadly serve it on an effective and sustained basis.” UnitedHealth said it also steepened its projected loss on the 2016 exchange business to $650 million from around $525 million, amid signs that new enrollees’ health status appeared worse.
Why didn't anyone predict this!!! Oh, wait......... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum
|
|
|
Search
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Register
