BLM blinks in their range war

[windoggi]

Agreed iso. If they want a Ruby Ridge, give it to them. I've had it with these assholes. The fact so many Americans back them depresses me.

[J64TWB]

I just google earthed 2 possible mountains perfect for growing dope. Windoggie you in?

[windoggi]

Fuck yeah. Let's get DUDE BRO MAN in on it too!

[MalibuGuru]

The stalemate is over. Bundy put sombreros on his cattle, so the feds are letting them roam freely now! Viva La Raza!

[windoggi]

VACA LIBRE

[MalibuGuru]

Federal Judge: BLM engaged in criminal conspiracy against ranchers, CIA working on Proxy war against Russia in Ukraine

For well over 20 years, the Bureau of Land Management engaged in a "literal intentional conspiracy" against Nevada ranchers to force them out of business, according to a federal judge whose court opinion exposes what the BLM's true intent was against rancher Cliven Bundy

In his opinion of United States V. Estate of Hage, U.S. District Court Judge Robert C. Jones reveals that after late Nevada rancher E. Wayne Hage indicated on his 1993 grazing permit renewals that by signing the permit, he was not giving up his family's long standing water and forage rights on the land, the BLM not only rejected the permit but conspired for DECADES to both deny his family's property rights and to destroy their cattle business

"Based upon E. Wayne Hage's declaration that he refused to waive his rights-a declaration that did not purport change the substance of the grazing renewal permit for which he was applying, and which had no plausible legal effect other than to superfluously assert non-waiver rights-the Government denied him a renewal grazing permit based upon its frankly non-sensical position that such assertion of rights meant that the application had not been properly completed"-Judge Jones wrote. "After the BLM denied his renewal grazing permit for this reason by letter, the Hages indicated that they would take the issue to court, and they sued the Government in the CFC [Court of Federal Claims]"

And the article shows how in 2007 given their dissatisfaction in the CFC, the Government brought fraudulent criminal trespass action against Hage and the Estate and the Government did not bring any sort of criminal misdemeanor trespass claims because as Jones wrote there was no burden of proof and the article has the excerpt showing this statement

SO basically the BLM willfully destroyed the Hage family's livelihood because Hage stood up for his rights and now they are doing the same thing with Cliven Bundy

As William Jasper of the New American wrote: "Has Attorney General Eric Holder prosecuted any federal officials for criminal activity and violation of the Hage family's constitutionally protected rights? No. Has Sen. Harry Reid denounced this lawlessness and criminal activity by government officials and call upon President Obama and Attorney Eric Holder to protect the citizens of his state from the depredations of federal officials under their command? No. With attitudes such as those expressed by Sen. Harry Reid, it is almost a certainty that the recently defused Bundy Ranch standoff will be replayed again-and in the not-too-distant future. And the outcome could be much less amicable for all concerned"

[swchandler]

I don't know why I need to keep reminding you to give proper credit to your sources. You didn't write your last post. Who did, and where did you find it?

[pueno]

[uwindsurf]

Bard says it is the same thing. It is the opposite. In Bard's source, the ranchers went to court and won. In Bundy's case, he went to court and lost. Apples to oranges.

Next ridiculous comparison?

[mac]

Read through to the end of Bardo's whacky source that he plagiarized to see the vile bigotry behind many of these new-militia, neo-fascists.