View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
isobars
Joined: 12 Dec 1999 Posts: 20935
|
Posted: Fri Aug 09, 2013 5:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
One. Twitch and looseness are not inherently synonymous. Many no-nose boards of the mid-90s were deliberately twitchy just for the sake of twitch; they were not looser. Likewise, some wave boards cut up waves and swell insanely, yet are still 100% trustworthy when blasting across any amount and size of chop at top speed. Your widget may be a leap forward, but a good hull and fin can go a long ways toward allowing both straight line stability and radical turning. Thus the real comparison must consider expense, hassle, durability, transferability among boards, and degree of improvement over leading, not just random, baselines.
Two. I demand a board that is better than I am (no lofty goal) but that submits to my every whim, often even before I know I wanted to do that. (I swear my 2008 Naish Pro 1111 often reads my mind.) If a board refuses my first few attempts to do what I want, it gets sold to a rider who doesn't want to do that or can do it better than I.
Three. I expect, and often get, both. A board that bites me in the butt when drag racing across chest-high chopswell OR thinks twice about reversing direction in under two seconds in that same terrain with both feet in their straps. That doesn’t allow or require twitch; it just requires a good shaper who wants that behavior and some rider practice.
Four. We old farts have seen many radical changes. Some were improvements, some were not, and many went both ways … pros and cons. Very few significant changes are panaceas.
Did I win? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
isobars
Joined: 12 Dec 1999 Posts: 20935
|
Posted: Fri Aug 09, 2013 5:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
drysuit2 wrote: | No.
Sport is supposed to be hard. |
Best response yet. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
KevinDo
Joined: 02 Jul 2012 Posts: 426 Location: Cabrillo Inside
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
rlemmens
Joined: 09 Feb 2008 Posts: 206
|
Posted: Fri Aug 09, 2013 9:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
probably just a wavejet for windsurfers |
|
Back to top |
|
|
winfreak
Joined: 26 Apr 2001 Posts: 61 Location: Oregon Coast
|
Posted: Fri Aug 09, 2013 10:16 pm Post subject: everyone wins! |
|
|
We are very pleased at all the responses so far. (I personally won the pool saying he would make it on last half of page 1. But I had to share the spoils due to the longer post on page 2).
This is a real company I work for and we have tested multiple ideas on the water. Most have been deemed not feasible for many of the reasons brought forth here today. I personally think the robotic system is the most far out there and unlikely to succeed but it made for a great title. No doubt we will lead off with a small "why didn't I think of that" type change. Your input is very important and appreciated even though we can not give specifics and therefore you do not know what we are contemplating. This sport/equipment will continue to evolve, rest assured. We hope to help drive that in a significant way.
We welcome more comments/answers , questions, and ideas if you want to share them. Our ultimate goal is MORE FUN for you! Please tell us what your wants and needs are... Thanks again, all for now... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nw30
Joined: 21 Dec 2008 Posts: 6485 Location: The eye of the universe, Cen. Cal. coast
|
Posted: Sat Aug 10, 2013 12:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
No, no, no, and no.
That would be like people wanting to get into golf, so they can drive the golf cart.
And if it were a high tech golf cart, even more people would want to play golf.
In fact, just throw the clubs away, they are too archaic, you could get the ball to go into the hole much easier with a lazar guided pointer of some kind.
Double in fact, just get rid of all challenges all together, we're better than that! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
westender
Joined: 02 Aug 2007 Posts: 1288 Location: Portland / Gorge
|
Posted: Sat Aug 10, 2013 12:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
Shit, guess I'm not into Windsurfing. If you were into Windsurfing, you'd build both types so you could have one of each. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dcharlton
Joined: 24 Apr 2002 Posts: 414
|
Posted: Sat Aug 10, 2013 8:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
My responses, cut and paste what Isobars said (minus the old farts...getting there but not just yet).
I'm intrigued about this apparatus and am guessing it's got something to do with water jet propolsion and directional fin turning with some automation uphaul device.
Anything you can do to bring young blood in the sport is a good thing. Yes, this sport is supposed to hard and that's a part of the appeal, however, if it makes it easier to learn and for newbies not to feel so out of place, I'm all for it.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
winfreak
Joined: 26 Apr 2001 Posts: 61 Location: Oregon Coast
|
Posted: Sat Aug 10, 2013 10:29 am Post subject: no free lunch |
|
|
There is almost always a price to pay.
Bringing more participants into, or back to, the sport is generally perceived as desirable. Until the overcrowding factor kicks in. Access will need to grow as well.
Too easy, then here come all the folks we may not welcome so easily to our family.
Some embrace change and are early adopters, others fear it.
To reiterate, we are looking at introducing what we consider positive changes that address market needs and increase the fun factor while maintaining the essence of what windsurfing is all about.
Will not get into specifics because of intellectual property concerns and the needs of players in the space to prepare for product launch. Besides. don't you want to be able to be wowed and then instantly go try/buy it for yourself?
Question(s): of the known players (windsurf boards), who do you feel is the most innovative, understands what the average windsurfer wants, and is most likely to bring out a new disruptive (game changing) product? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nw30
Joined: 21 Dec 2008 Posts: 6485 Location: The eye of the universe, Cen. Cal. coast
|
Posted: Sun Aug 11, 2013 5:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
"Robotic power assist" seems to me to be directed towards cutting edge changes with the rig, not the board, it's the rig that provides the power, not the board. If you assisted the boards power, that would work against the rig, and keep going, then you have no need for a rig, those are already on the market, the Wave Jet.
As for the steering part, that is also mostly rig handling along with foot pressure, and today's fins are awesome.
"Robotic power assist" in windsurfing would be more like push button controls on the booms for remote reefing (changing the size) and tuning your sail while sailing. One rig that could give you the power of a 3.5 to a 6.5 w/o changing a thing, just press some buttons.
If I were Sir Richard Branson. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You can attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
|
|