myiW Current Conditions and Forecasts Community Forums Buy and Sell Services
 
Hi guest · myAccount · Log in
 SearchSearch   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   RegisterRegister 
Racetrack/Albany Beach Restoration project Update
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    iWindsurf Community Forum Index -> Southwest USA, Hawaii, Mexico
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Riptide



Joined: 15 Jan 2011
Posts: 411

PostPosted: Sat Feb 02, 2013 2:19 pm    Post subject: Racetrack/Albany Beach Restoration project Update Reply with quote

http://www.insidebayarea.com/top-stories/ci_22490324/albany-beach-restoration-plan-challenged

This article about the Albany Bulb/ Race Track sailing site in the east bay mentions windsurfing as a detriment to eel grass and challenges the EIR in a Law suit.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
VinceSF



Joined: 05 Apr 2005
Posts: 249
Location: Maui, HI

PostPosted: Sat Feb 02, 2013 2:31 pm    Post subject: Re: Racetrack/Albany Beach Restoration project Update Reply with quote

Riptide wrote:
http://www.insidebayarea.com/top-stories/ci_22490324/albany-beach-restoration-plan-challenged

This article about the Albany Bulb/ Race Track sailing site in the east bay mentions windsurfing as a detriment to eel grass and challenges the EIR in a Law suit.


Who Launches there? no one I know.
this is a non issue: they can close it to windsurfing, no one should have a problem with it. we have many other launches! (dog shit park anyone?)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Riptide



Joined: 15 Jan 2011
Posts: 411

PostPosted: Sat Feb 02, 2013 2:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

They may be confusing windsurfing with kite boarding as it is used for kite boarding frequently.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
coachg



Joined: 10 Sep 2000
Posts: 3546

PostPosted: Sat Feb 02, 2013 3:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Vince,

It’s not an issue how many people do or don’t sail there, it is all about precedence in a court of law. If they win this battle then the precedence has been set for future battles in the courts at more popular sites.

Coachg
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
VinceSF



Joined: 05 Apr 2005
Posts: 249
Location: Maui, HI

PostPosted: Sat Feb 02, 2013 10:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

thank you both for your corrections.
So kiters=bad.
we just need, once again, to make sure we're not lump-sumed into the "crazy cooks with their shiny machines" category.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Arrgh



Joined: 05 May 1998
Posts: 864
Location: Rio

PostPosted: Mon Feb 04, 2013 11:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Even our friends at sfba seem a bit confused about the terminology:
http://sfba.org/index.php/news-events/101-east-bay-updates


Last edited by Arrgh on Mon Feb 04, 2013 4:37 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
victor



Joined: 03 Aug 1998
Posts: 581

PostPosted: Mon Feb 04, 2013 2:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

>Who Launches there? no one I know.
>this is a non issue: they can close it to windsurfing, no one should have a >problem with it. we have many other launches! (dog shit park anyone?)

even though the racetrack may not be a windsurf launch, pt. isabel , aka dog shit park, and marina bay are right around the corner. if damage to eel grass is an issue at the racetrack it could also be a reason for those other two sites to be declared off limits.

actually there's quite a bit of eel grass at berkeley, too.

boardsports have seemed to have had little effect on the eel grass in bodega and tomales bay. it is my understanding that bodega bay is the result of a successful human reintroduction program. they planted an experimental patch at larkspur and the poor water quality did that in.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mac



Joined: 07 Mar 1999
Posts: 17736
Location: Berkeley, California

PostPosted: Mon Feb 04, 2013 5:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Let me see if I can clear up a few things. First, eel grass is not as common in San Francisco Bay as most biologists expect. There is a large bed in San Pablo Bay and smaller beds near the base of the Bay Bridge, near the Emeryville Shoal, near the Treasure Island ramp, and in the lee of the breakwater at the entrance channel to the Richmond Harbor. Windsurfers have sailed out of Berkeley and Emeryville, and run into the fronds near the Emeryville shoal for decades, and there is no no evidence that it has had any adverse impact on the bed. Eel grass is a valuable habitat, and depends on water clarity and soil that is not too muddy.

Second, some members of the Sierra Club are extremely hostile to public access, and are willing to develop arguments that seriously stretch the science to support their hostility. The same guy who is behind this lawsuit also opposed the Bay Trail extension near Buchanan Street, when it was proposed about a decade ago. That area continues to be heavily used by waterbirds, with different species present at different tidal stages, despite heavy use of the Bay Trail. The Bay Trail project was approved over his objections. Many members of the Citizens for East Shore Parks (CESP) support improved access to the water, although they oppose dog use. The Sierra Club representative was unable to secure CESP support in opposing increased public access, either before the East Bay Regional Park District Board, or in the lawsuit. The State park plan designates this area for access to the water, and it has been used for kite access for a number of years--while eel grass beds have been increasing. So the East Bay Regional Park District said in the final EIR that there is already substantial use of the area, and their project, which would increase the size of the beach and the area where eel grass is expected to grow, would have net environmental benefits. That is, there will be more eel grass and more access.

SFBA and our allies among the kayakers, particularly at Bay Access, continue to support real biological science. In cases like this, the bias against public access is seen by many in the public arena as bias and advocacy, not as well reasoned objections.

I do think that the update on the SFBA site is accurate. The launch here is east of the stronger wind, and is used far more by kites than windsurfers. Of course, as such, with the shorter fins on kiteboards and the fact that eel grass fronds are under water except at extreme low tides, it is nearly impossible to imagine kite fins doing any appreciable damage to the submerged beds.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
victor



Joined: 03 Aug 1998
Posts: 581

PostPosted: Mon Feb 04, 2013 5:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

figures that the overzealous sierra club and their bad science misinformation were involved.

Last edited by victor on Wed Feb 06, 2013 4:29 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
glazier



Joined: 08 May 2000
Posts: 17

PostPosted: Mon Feb 04, 2013 9:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mac, Thanks for the update and info. I saw the original article and thought somebody was confused with the mention of"windsurfers and eel grass damage" or else had an ulterior motive, which seems to be the case.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    iWindsurf Community Forum Index -> Southwest USA, Hawaii, Mexico All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You can attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum

myiW | Weather | Community | Membership | Support | Log in
like us on facebook
© Copyright 1999-2007 WeatherFlow, Inc Contact Us Ad Marketplace

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group