View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
jp5
Joined: 19 May 1998 Posts: 3394 Location: OnUr6
|
Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2016 9:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
Nailed it Techno. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mat-ty
Joined: 07 Jul 2007 Posts: 7850
|
Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2016 10:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think bluefish should move before he's deadfish. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
isobars
Joined: 12 Dec 1999 Posts: 20935
|
Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2016 12:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
techno900 wrote: | I think most of the conservatives here on the forum are fine with ... possibly a restriction on assault type weapons and or magazine size limits ... |
Only when combining the two. Limiting pistol magazine capacity to anything less than maybe 20 is suicidal, even for cops. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
MalibuGuru
Joined: 11 Nov 1993 Posts: 9293
|
Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2016 1:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
isobars wrote: | techno900 wrote: | I think most of the conservatives here on the forum are fine with ... possibly a restriction on assault type weapons and or magazine size limits ... |
Only when combining the two. Limiting pistol magazine capacity to anything less than maybe 20 is suicidal, even for cops. |
It's already been done in California sadly. Ten rounds is not enough to take down a couple of dudes beating your wife at 50 yards. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jp5
Joined: 19 May 1998 Posts: 3394 Location: OnUr6
|
Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2016 2:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
New Ca law effective 1/2017 no more detachable magazines of any capacity on any rifle. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jp5
Joined: 19 May 1998 Posts: 3394 Location: OnUr6
|
Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2016 2:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mat-ty wrote: | I think bluefish should move before he's deadfish. |
Maybe Dean will put him up in his bunker. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
techno900
Joined: 28 Mar 2001 Posts: 4161
|
Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2016 3:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I had to check it out.
Quote: | With limited exceptions, California law prohibits any person from manufacturing, importing into the state, keeping for sale, offering or exposing for sale, giving, or lending any large capacity magazine. Cal. Penal Code § 12020(a)(2), (b). A "large capacity magazine" is defined as any ammunition feeding device with the capacity to accept more than ten rounds, but does not include any .22 caliber tube ammunition feeding device, any feeding device that has been permanently altered so that it cannot accommodate more than ten rounds, or any tubular magazine that is contained in a lever-action firearm. Section 12020(c)(25). California does not ban the possession of large capacity magazines. |
All those existing guns with large capacity magazines are still legal. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
MalibuGuru
Joined: 11 Nov 1993 Posts: 9293
|
Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2016 3:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
After January 1, anyone who owns a large capacity magazine in California will have to just throw them away. Seems like an illegal taking of property which at one time was protected by the constitution..... The guns will be legal, the magazines won't |
|
Back to top |
|
|
J64TWB
Joined: 24 Dec 2013 Posts: 1685
|
Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2016 4:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't have a solution Techno, I'm just pointing out statistical facts. 2,600 shot in a few months vs. zero shot or killed in the city's history by isis.
Which is a greater threat? Also, wouldn't dying by isis be a "social problem" as well under your description? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jp5
Joined: 19 May 1998 Posts: 3394 Location: OnUr6
|
Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2016 4:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Just out of curiosity bluefish, what kind of people are these? Are there drugs involved? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You cannot download files in this forum
|
|
|