myiW Current Conditions and Forecasts Community Forums Buy and Sell Services
 
Hi guest · myAccount · Log in
 SearchSearch   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   RegisterRegister 
Pipe dream? Obamacare
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 185, 186, 187 ... 199, 200, 201  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    iWindsurf Community Forum Index -> Politics, Off-Topic, Opinions
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
swchandler



Joined: 08 Nov 1993
Posts: 10588

PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2014 1:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

From the latest good news about the costs of the ACA, there is some suggestion that healthcare insurance costs are projected go up in 2015, and then flatten out and even possibly decrease over time. As one might expect, Republicans are praying feverishly for the costs to go up for 2015, because the timing for them is perfect. It's usually in November that everyone makes their yearly selection decision regarding the plans available to them in the upcoming year. If insurance companies re-adjust their rates upward costing both the government and individuals more, a strong anti-ACA message from Republicans may be enough to influence on-the-fence voters in the mid-term elections to give them a majority in the Senate. It's a moment in time that makes it or breaks it for Republicans and their ability to kill the ACA.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
isobars



Joined: 12 Dec 1999
Posts: 20935

PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2014 1:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

techno900 wrote:
When it comes to telling lies about Obamacare, you might be on thin ice when you point your finger at the Republicans.

Especially when the biggest Obamacare lies, hands down, and probably the biggest policy lies in modern political history, came straight from The Man's teleprompter at least 26 times.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
uwindsurf



Joined: 18 Aug 2012
Posts: 968
Location: Classified

PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2014 1:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

“In the Netherlands, people wear different bracelets if they are elderly. And the bracelet is: ‘Do not euthanize me.’ Because they have voluntary euthanasia in the Netherlands but half of the people who are euthanized — ten percent of all deaths in the Netherlands — half of those people are enthanized involuntarily at hospitals because they are older and sick. And so elderly people in the Netherlands don’t go to the hospital. They go to another country, because they are afraid, because of budget purposes, they will not come out of that hospital if they go in there with sickness.”
— Former senator Rick Santorum, at the American Heartland Forum in Columbia, Missouri, Feb. 3, 2012

These were interesting remarks by one of the leading candidates for the GOP nomination. Though Santorum made this observation earlier in the month, a video of his comments only circulated on the web over the weekend and a number of readers asked whether he is correct. (His comments also spawned headlines in Holland, such as one that proclaimed: “Rick Santorum Thinks He Knows the Netherlands: Murder of the Elderly on a Grand Scale.”)

So we will check his statistics — 10 percent of all deaths in the Netherlands are from euthanasia and 50 percent of those die involuntarily — and also his claim that the elderly wear bracelets requesting that they not be euthanized...There appears to be not a shred of evidence to back up Santorum’s claims about euthanasia in the Netherlands. It is telling that his campaign did not even bother to defend his comments."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/euthanasia-in-the-netherlands-rick-santorums-bogus-statistics/2012/02/21/gIQAJaRbSR_blog.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pueno



Joined: 03 Mar 2007
Posts: 2807

PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2014 1:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mr. Fick-shun wrote:
Especially when the biggest Obamacare lies, hands down, and probably the biggest policy lies in modern political history, came straight from The Man's teleprompter at least 26 times.

Come on, Rush... Have you been listening to that Mike Fick again?
.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
uwindsurf



Joined: 18 Aug 2012
Posts: 968
Location: Classified

PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2014 1:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

So, I wondered about “Bette in Spokane”, mentioned in the official GOP SOTU response. I wondered how she could face a $700 a month increase in premiums, and speculated that she must have had “a really bare-bones policy offering hardly any protection.”

Well, now we know, and I was right: her previous plan was catastrophic coverage only, with a $10,000 deductible — and the “$700 a month more” was the most expensive option offered by her insurer. She didn’t go to the healthcare.gov website, where she could have found cheaper plans.

So this wasn’t sticker shock, at least as described. This was someone finding out that the ACA requires that you have a minimum level of insurance, and that minimalist plans are no longer allowed — and it was also Ms. Rodgers misrepresenting what had happened.

Oh, and why isn’t catastrophic coverage only allowed? For the same reason we have a coverage mandate in the first place: everyone has to be in the risk pool. If you’re allowed to have insurance that barely covers anything, that’s almost the same as not participating at all.

http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/01/30/bette-in-spokane-blogging/?_php=true&_type=blogs&module=BlogPost-Title&version=Blog%20Main&contentCollection=Opinion&action=Click&pgtype=Blogs&region=Body&_r=0
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
techno900



Joined: 28 Mar 2001
Posts: 4161

PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2014 3:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

youwindsurf said:
Quote:
Oh, and why isn’t catastrophic coverage only allowed? For the same reason we have a coverage mandate in the first place: everyone has to be in the risk pool. If you’re allowed to have insurance that barely covers anything, that’s almost the same as not participating at all.


And no participation means that there won't be enough money to pay for those that get the subsidized Obamacare. So much for the freedom to choose one's own health care insurance options.

I wonder when, or if we will here how many of the 7 million that signed up for Obamacare will be subsidized. Don't hold your breath.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
uwindsurf



Joined: 18 Aug 2012
Posts: 968
Location: Classified

PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2014 3:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

techno900 wrote:
youwindsurf said:
Quote:
Oh, and why isn’t catastrophic coverage only allowed? For the same reason we have a coverage mandate in the first place: everyone has to be in the risk pool. If you’re allowed to have insurance that barely covers anything, that’s almost the same as not participating at all.


And no participation means that there won't be enough money to pay for those that get the subsidized Obamacare. So much for the freedom to choose one's own health care insurance options.

I wonder when, or if we will here how many of the 7 million that signed up for Obamacare will be subsidized. Don't hold your breath.


I guess you missed this part: "She didn’t go to the healthcare.gov website, where she could have found cheaper plans."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
isobars



Joined: 12 Dec 1999
Posts: 20935

PostPosted: Thu Apr 17, 2014 12:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

techno900 wrote:
I wonder when, or if we will hear how many of the 7 million that signed up for Obamacare will be subsidized.

We won't even find out how many of the those 7M are ACTUALLY enrolled, how many had insurance before Ocare, how many had preexisting conditions, how many are subsidized, or much more. Why? Because now that the administration shifted Census Bureau control to the White House, the questions it asks of the populace are designed by the administration (a la Pravda). Rather than ask, "Were you uninsured before the ACA?" or "Did your insurance costs increase?", or "Have you ever been denied health care insurance?", they will now ask, "How is your day going?", "Did you put a policy in your cart?", and "Will you be voting next year?".

This is unbelievable, and the media, whose responsibility to the world is to critically challenge the government as part of our checks and balance system, is complicit.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
keycocker



Joined: 10 Jul 2005
Posts: 3598

PostPosted: Thu Apr 17, 2014 1:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The problem lies mainly in the easily fooled conservatives who repeat lobbyist lies almost nonstop like Iso.
Army of fools pretending to be well informed as their minds grow weaker each day.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
keycocker



Joined: 10 Jul 2005
Posts: 3598

PostPosted: Thu Apr 17, 2014 1:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The reason the conservative Heritage Foundation included the mandate was so the one third of Americans who have been passing their health costs on to taxpayers would have some skin in the game.
It is about personal responsibility.
We are already paying that money out techno in the current broken system.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    iWindsurf Community Forum Index -> Politics, Off-Topic, Opinions All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 185, 186, 187 ... 199, 200, 201  Next
Page 186 of 201

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

myiW | Weather | Community | Membership | Support | Log in
like us on facebook
© Copyright 1999-2007 WeatherFlow, Inc Contact Us Ad Marketplace

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group