myiW Current Conditions and Forecasts Community Forums Buy and Sell Services
Hi guest · myAccount · Log in
 SearchSearch   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   RegisterRegister 
Mitt Romney as the savior of American jobs?

Post new topic   Reply to topic    iWindsurf Community Forum Index -> Politics, Off-Topic, Opinions
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message

Joined: 07 Mar 1999
Posts: 15665
Location: Berkeley, California

PostPosted: Wed Oct 10, 2012 12:35 pm    Post subject: Mitt Romney as the savior of American jobs? Reply with quote

Only a portion of this was reprinted in the SF Chronicle:


The tale of Asimco Technologies, an auto parts manufacturer whose plants dot eastern China, would seem to underscore Mitt Romney’s campaign-trail complaint that China’s manufacturing juggernaut is costing America jobs.

Asimco, an auto parts maker with plants in Beijing and elsewhere in China, bought two Michigan factories with 500 workers but shut them down in 2007. It is now owned by Bain Capital.

A Zhengzhou outlet of Gome Electrical Appliances, a major Chinese retailer that Microsoft has accused of selling computers with pirated software. Bain invested $234 million in Gome in 2009.

Nine years ago, the company bought two camshaft factories that employed about 500 people in Michigan. By 2007 both were shut down. Now Asimco manufactures the same components in China on government-donated land in a coastal region that China has designated an export base, where companies are eligible for the sort of subsidies Mr. Romney says create an unfair trade imbalance.

But there is a twist to the Asimco story that would not fit neatly into a Romney stump speech: Since 2010, it has been owned by Bain Capital, the private equity firm founded by Mr. Romney, who has as much as $2.25 million invested in three Bain funds with large stakes in Asimco and at least seven other Chinese businesses, according to his 2012 candidate financial disclosure and other documents.

That and other China-related holdings by Bain funds in which Mr. Romney has invested are a reminder of how he inhabits two worlds that at times have come into conflict during his campaign for the White House.

As a candidate, Mr. Romney uses China as a punching bag. He accuses Beijing of unfairly subsidizing Chinese exports, artificially holding down the value of its currency to keep exports cheap, stealing American technology and hacking into corporate and government computers.

“How is it China’s been so successful in taking away our jobs?” he asked recently. “Well, let me tell you how: by cheating.”

But his private equity dealings, both while he headed Bain and since, complicate that message.

Mr. Romney’s campaign insists he has no control over his investments since they are held in a blind trust. That said, a confidential prospectus for one of the Bain funds, obtained by The New York Times, promotes China as a good investment for some of the same reasons that Mr. Romney has said concern him: “Strong fundamentals” like manufacturing wages 85 percent lower than what Americans earn, vast foreign exchange reserves and the likelihood that China will surpass the United States as the world’s largest economy.

“Accordingly, Bain Capital expects to see an increasing array of high-growth companies available for investment,” the prospectus says, noting the relative dearth of private equity in China.

Among the companies in which the Bain funds have invested is a global auto parts maker that is in the process of closing a factory in Illinois and moving most of the equipment and jobs to Jiangsu Province, where the Chinese government has built it a new plant; a Chinese electronics retailer accused by Microsoft of selling computers with pirated software; and a Hong Kong-based Chinese appliance maker that was sued for copying another company’s design for a deep-fat fryer.

Asked if Mr. Romney sees any conflict between his Bain investments in China and his policy positions, the campaign said: “Only the president has the power to level the playing field with China. No private citizen can do that alone.”

The campaign said Mr. Romney put his fortune, estimated at $250 million, in a “blind trust” when he became Massachusetts governor in 2003. “The trustee of the blind trust has said publicly that he will endeavor to make the investments in the blind trust conform to Governor Romney’s positions, and whenever it comes to his attention that there is something inconsistent, he ends the investment,” the statement said.

Should Mr. Romney become president, however, the structure of the trust would most likely not meet the federal requirements for independent management. It is managed by a Boston-based law firm, Ropes & Gray, that has a long history of doing legal work for both Mr. Romney and Bain Capital, including representing some of the same Bain funds in which it invested Mr. Romney’s money.

Mr. Romney’s trustee, R. Bradford Malt, who is chairman of Ropes & Gray, declined to comment.

Bain Capital declined to comment on specific investments, but said in a statement that its Chinese holdings “are consistent with the widely accepted principle that the private sector has a critical role to play in the continuing interdependence of the world’s economies.”

For many sophisticated and wealthy investors, as well as for ordinary workers invested in pension funds, China is a part of any diversified investment strategy. President Obama, a former Illinois state senator, has as much as $100,000 in a state retirement plan that contains shares of Sensata Technologies, the same auto parts company controlled by Bain that is closing its Illinois factory.

Last year, Mr. Romney’s trust sold its stake in an array of foreign holdings, including two Chinese state-owned companies: an oil company and a bank that have done business in Iran. But Mr. Romney continues to have money in Bain funds with sizable holdings in China.

He has as much as $250,000 in the Bain Capital Asia Fund and as much as $1 million each in Bain Capital Funds IX and X, all Cayman Islands entities used by Bain to make sizable investments in China, according to the 2012 candidate financial disclosures and confidential Bain prospectuses obtained by The Times through a public records request.

Among those funds’ holdings is $234 million that Bain invested in 2009 in Gome Electrical Appliances, a major Chinese retailer that was accused by Microsoft this year of selling computers with pirated software. In 2007, Bain’s Asia fund also invested $39 million in Feixiang Group, a Chinese producer and exporter of chemicals that is a designated “state high-tech enterprise,” making it eligible for tax breaks and other government incentives. Ropes & Gray represented Bain in the partial sale of Feixiang three years later for a 53 percent return on the fund’s investment.

The Asia fund withdrew from another deal in 2008 that could have proved politically embarrassing to Mr. Romney. After the Bush administration objected, Bain dropped plans to team up with a Chinese technology giant, Huawei, to buy 3Com, a network equipment maker that supplies software and equipment to the Pentagon and other federal agencies.

The administration said intelligence reports indicated that Huawei, which was founded by a former People’s Liberation Army officer, posed “national security problems,” according to a lawsuit stemming from the deal’s collapse. A House Intelligence Committee report released Monday said Huawei continued to have troubling connections to the Chinese government, something the company denies.

Bain’s interest in China dates to when Mr. Romney ran the firm. During a panel discussion at the Federal Reserve Bank in Boston in February 1998, he told of touring an appliance factory in China where 5,000 employees “were working, working, working, as hard as they could, at rates of roughly 50 cents an hour.”

Not long afterward, a Bain affiliate, Brookside Capital Partners, acquired about 6 percent of Global-Tech Appliances, whose factory in many ways matched Mr. Romney’s description. The next year, Brookside and another Bain-related entity increased their stake to 9 percent, before selling their shares in 2000.

Just before Bain bought shares, a French firm accused Global-Tech of stealing its deep-fat fryer design. In a decision affirmed by the Supreme Court in 2011, the company was found to have willfully violated the French firm’s United States patent, selling the knockoffs even after it was sued.

Mr. Romney also has millions invested in a series of Bain funds that have a controlling stake in Sensata Technologies, a manufacturer of sensors and controls for vehicles, aircraft and electric motors that employs 4,000 workers in China. Since Bain took over the operation in 2006, its investment has quadrupled in value. Bain continues to own $2.6 billion worth of Sensata’s shares.

Two years ago, Sensata bought an operation that made automobile sensors in Freeport, Ill. At the first meeting with the plant’s 170 workers, Sensata managers announced that by the end of 2012 all the equipment and jobs would be relocated, mostly to Jiangsu Province. Workers have staged demonstrations, pleading for Mr. Romney to intervene on their behalf.

Chinese engineers, flown to Freeport for training on the equipment, described their salaries as a pittance compared with Freeport wages. Tom Gaulrapp, who has operated machines at the factory for 33 years, said he fears he will go bankrupt after he loses his job on Nov. 5.

“This goes to show the unbelievable hypocrisy of this man,” he said of Mr. Romney. “He talks about how we need to get tough on China and stop China from taking our jobs, and then he is making money off shipping our jobs there.”

It is often difficult to determine precisely how much Mr. Romney benefits from specific investments by Bain funds, since his money goes into a pool used to buy stakes in companies. In the case of Sensata, however, it is clearer because he reported a charitable donation of $405,000 in Sensata stock that he received as “partnership distributions” in 2010 and 2011, according to his tax returns.

Jiangsu Province, where most of the Freeport jobs are moving, is one of China’s designated “export bases” for auto parts. Asimco, the other auto parts manufacturer in Bain’s portfolio, also has factories in Jiangsu Province and three other regions designated as export bases.

The Chinese government incentives offered to companies in those “bases” set off a complaint from the United States to the World Trade Organization last month. The United States asserted that in 2011, China spent $1 billion on grants, tax preferences, lowered interest rates and other subsidies to increase exports of auto parts in violation of fair trade rules.

Mr. Romney has been critical of these types of Chinese incentives to bolster exports.

The state-controlled Chinese Academy of Sciences has provided free research and development to Asimco, which exports at least 15 percent of its products, primarily to the United States. The authorities also gave the company land to build the factory that replaced the plants in Grand Haven, Mich.

Asimco’s China operations became a point of contention in bankruptcy proceedings that accompanied the closing of the Michigan plants. The bankruptcy trustee said that internal Asimco e-mails showed the company had transferred money to China to qualify for a Chinese tax rebate available only to manufacturers of exported products.

Jack Perkowski, the former longtime chairman of Asimco who now advises Western companies seeking to enter the Chinese market, said Asimco never benefited from export-related subsidies because most of its customers are in China. “I honestly can’t think of anything we could have gotten that was tied to the fact we were exporting,” he said.

But the company is striving for more overseas buyers. Last year Zhang Dejiang, the Chinese vice prime minister in charge of transportation, visited an Asimco assembly line and offered encouragement to workers. According to a statement on the company’s Web site, Mr. Zhang was particularly impressed that “the company’s products can rival their Western counterparts.”

Keith Bradsher contributed reporting from Beijing. Amy Qin and Shi Da contributed research from Beijing. Jeffrey E. Singer contributed research from New York.

Now I have no trouble with Mitt making money. But for his experience offshoring jobs, and making boatloads of money doing it, to be paraded as business acumen that is important to his qualifications as President is lunacy. Of course, the same could be said about some commentors arguments that tithing through his church white washes his dishonesty and hypocrisy.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message

Joined: 07 Jul 2007
Posts: 7837

PostPosted: Wed Oct 10, 2012 12:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Last time I checked, Mitts job as a businessman was not to create jobs, it was to make money for his company, shareholders, etc. I am pretty confident he did what most businesses in America do, just like Apple, Nike, GE, GOVERNMENT MOTORS(GM) and countless others.
But like most other libs you would rather talk about big bird, condoms and attack Mitt with baseless nonsense. But I guess you have few options considering barrys dismal record.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message

Joined: 19 May 1998
Posts: 3393
Location: OnUr6

PostPosted: Wed Oct 10, 2012 1:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

mat-ty wrote:
Last time I checked, Mitts job as a businessman was not to create jobs, it was to make money for his company, shareholders, etc. ..

Thus he has no proven track record of creating jobs, one of the many things he claims he has a plan for. Why would anyone concerned with future jobs outlook vote for this guy?

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message

Joined: 22 Feb 2002
Posts: 2743

PostPosted: Wed Oct 10, 2012 1:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

And why is there this accepted idea among the right that a businessman would make a good president? Our government is not a for profit business.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message

Joined: 11 Nov 1993
Posts: 8743

PostPosted: Wed Oct 10, 2012 6:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

If Mitt could just "offshore" all govt jobs, we'd save trillions....Hell Yeah.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message

Joined: 08 Nov 1993
Posts: 9883

PostPosted: Wed Oct 10, 2012 7:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bard, I think that you're missing the picture. While Romney's about offshoring manufacturing, he'll also promoting illegal immigration. It's the double whammy. Now, you might think that Romney might be against the latter, but there's no way in hell that he's going to come out against corporate agriculture. No way! And, that is the seed stock that spreads to what we have today. If young folks don't come out of the educational system ready for a productive future, they're doomed to cheap labor either offshore or locally onshore.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message

Joined: 11 Nov 1993
Posts: 8743

PostPosted: Wed Oct 10, 2012 8:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

SWC, the proverbial Cat is out of the bag when it comes to trade. I thought Ross Perot had it right, and I voted for him. However, now we have it. Hopefully Romney will stop debasing our currency, and get China to stop doing the same. This would help our manufacturing base. Reducing regulations carefully and implementing a flatter tax with less deductions will also help growth. This would also cut the need for so many lobbyists.

If Romney takes the lead he could make a difference. No one knows whether this will happen, however IMO if we stick with BO, we get more of the same.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message

Joined: 12 Dec 1999
Posts: 19995

PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 8:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

stevenbard wrote:
Hopefully Romney will stop debasing our currency

If you're referring to printing play money, the "Aftershock" authors give him/us no alternative at this point. According to them, this process, aka QE, is what's artificially inflating the stock market, it cannot succeed for more than another year or three, and the longer we delay the inevitable, the harder the fall.
Here are some election outcome prospects:
1. "Aftershock" is right, Romney wins, but nothing even Romney can do will save the world from prolonged financial collapse during his first term, dooming the Republican Party for decades.
2. "Aftershock" is overstated, the global collapse can possibly be mitigated by superior fiscal management, Romney succeeds, and we'll never know whether "Aftershock" was wrong, Romney is magic, or both, or neither.
3. "Aftershock" is right, Obama is in the White House, the collapse is wildly exacerbated by his total fiscal ineptitude, and things get even worse than the book forecasts ... if that's possible. (You guys interested in this book are in for a mind-blowing, very well supported, very frightening scenario that more economists and blue chip and Wall Street CEOs espouse every week or so. Anyone who has -- or loves anyone with -- a life expectancy over 4 years from now (or advises others on financial matters) owes it to himself and anyone dependent on him to at least skim this book.

I'm not turning my family fiscal paradigms upside down -- yet -- based on this book and its international supporters, but it sure as hell is influencing my purchases, investments, and planning. Heads up. (Just one tiny, barely consequential example: We're likely to replace my wife's '06 minivan sooner rather than later, in case Aftershock is right that import car prices will increase by 300-400% and gasoline will hit $15, in today's dollars, before our minivan hits 120,000 miles (it's @ 86k now) ... even if the middle east does NOT blow up. Remember: this book is not political.)

And heads up to anyone considering reading this fascinating, apolitical, detailed but very understandable, highly logical economics book: there are two books out with that name. I'm referring to "Aftershock: Protect Yourself and Profit in the Next Global Financial Meltdown" (Second Edition, published in 2011) by Wiedemer and Spitzer, the ones who predicted 2008/09. I am definitely NOT referring to the "Aftershock: I'm a Lying, Deceptive, Extreme Left Political Hack Paul Krugman Clone" written by that dishonest lunatic, Robert Reisch.

As for "voting for Perot" ... Anyone voting for any third party candidate in a Presidential election is voluntarily throwing away a right that millions of men have died to establish and defend: our right to vote, even if it IS just for the electoral college, not directly for a candidate.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    iWindsurf Community Forum Index -> Politics, Off-Topic, Opinions All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

myiW | Weather | Community | Membership | Support | Log in
like us on facebook
© Copyright 1999-2007 WeatherFlow, Inc Contact Us Ad Marketplace

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group