myiW Current Conditions and Forecasts Community Forums Buy and Sell Services
 
Hi guest · myAccount · Log in
 SearchSearch   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   RegisterRegister 
the big lie "the media is liberal"
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 221, 222, 223 ... 275, 276, 277  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    iWindsurf Community Forum Index -> Politics, Off-Topic, Opinions
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
real-human



Joined: 02 Jul 2011
Posts: 14879
Location: on earth

PostPosted: Thu Nov 03, 2016 12:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

here is a major lie

trump says he does not know the Mob guy, here he is with him front seat. also the mob guy was the biggest spender at trump casino. trump would go with him on his helicopter, trump casino was fined by the NJ gaming over $200k for having him in trumps casino. Trump bought mobs daughter a car for her birthday. oh but he does not know him. what a liar


Quote:
Trump claimed not to know this mob figure
Trump has, on more than on occasion, said he didn't know a man named Robert LiButti. That might be because LiButti had a personal history of fraud and was reported to have ties to mob boss John Gotti.


_________________
when good people stay silent the right wing are the only ones heard.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
real-human



Joined: 02 Jul 2011
Posts: 14879
Location: on earth

PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 7:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

another lie at Fox news and no firing. aggain dan rather told the truth that still has never been proven wrong and heads rolled.

Here is a blatent lie...
Quote:

Fox News apologizes for falsely reporting that Clinton faces indictment

“It was a mistake,” said Fox News anchor Bret Baier, who also retracted the report that the candidate was hacked by foreign spies.



another example the people that were responsible for Not taking Christie's word about bridgate... well the owners of those papers cut the reporters... these reporters were responsible for digging into it and discovering the lies of Christie's top people...



http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow/watch/trump-saddled-with-christie-s-legal-problems-801658947926?cid=eml_mra_20161106

_________________
when good people stay silent the right wing are the only ones heard.


Last edited by real-human on Sun Nov 06, 2016 9:07 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
real-human



Joined: 02 Jul 2011
Posts: 14879
Location: on earth

PostPosted: Sun Nov 06, 2016 9:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

gee is this a politcal contribution? No different than Fox and the rest of the right wing owned media which is at least 80-90 percent owned and controlled by right wingers.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/catch-and-kill-at-national-enquirer-gives-media-one-last-black-eye-before-election/2016/11/05/2534d43e-a36c-11e6-8832-23a007c77bb4_story.html?wpisrc=nl_headlines&wpmm=1

‘Catch and kill’ at National Enquirer gives media one last black eye before election


Quote:
By Margaret Sullivan Media Columnist November 5 at 3:59 PM
In the tabloid business, the practice is called “catch and kill.”

That phrase was circulating on Saturday after the Wall Street Journal’s solidly reported story that the National Enquirer — no stranger to checkbook journalism — had laid out $150,000 in August to a former Playboy magazine Playmate, who says she had a lengthy adulterous affair with Donald Trump a decade ago.

The paper paid for exclusive rights to Karen McDougal’s story but never published it, the Journal reported. Thus: catch and kill, otherwise known as trapping a story to keep it out of the public eye, for one reason or another.

The tabloid, run by Trump pal David Pecker, is one of a tiny handful of papers to endorse Trump for president. (The Enquirer’s parent company claims that it paid McDougal not only for rights to an unspecified personal story, but also to write a fitness column.)

Trump, through a spokeswoman, has denied the affair. And of course, such a story would not have revealed anything new about Trump’s character, nor would it have been disqualifying to his candidacy.

_________________
when good people stay silent the right wing are the only ones heard.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
real-human



Joined: 02 Jul 2011
Posts: 14879
Location: on earth

PostPosted: Mon Nov 07, 2016 12:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

this idiot General Flynn is such a disgrace to america. A retired General that is this stupid. Imagine that... again how can a guy become a General in the military and be so friggen stupid. What does this say about national security.

Again the guy is so stupid he can not figure out how the FBI can determine if the emails were duplicates so fast. Imagine that. He is so stupud and the media is not making it a national disgrace how stupid the US miliary is.

Also same with the FBI, again this stuff can be done in a matter of hours. But for them it took a week or more.

Our FBI, CIA, Military all allowed 9-11 to occur. They are all right wing incompetent failures and should be resigning so people with a brain can take over. We have one idiot on this forum that is retired military that also proves how stupid people in the military are. But this case it was a general. I listened to virtually all the FBI testimony during the 9-11 investigation... do people realize how stupid they are? they did not even have a computer system that could do a google search function. That is how stupid the entire FBI and its right wing culture was. And Ashfroft testified he had recently started working on a system several YEARS after the event. What morons. Remember the day before 9-11 the Bush administration was seeking to reduce the funding to counter terrorism.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/edward-snowden-hillary-clinton-emails_us_581fe27de4b0aac62485334d

_________________
when good people stay silent the right wing are the only ones heard.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jp5



Joined: 19 May 1998
Posts: 3394
Location: OnUr6

PostPosted: Tue Nov 08, 2016 1:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Your original post is correct Q-ball. The media supported Hillary and she is a moderate. Arrow Question Rolling Eyes
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
real-human



Joined: 02 Jul 2011
Posts: 14879
Location: on earth

PostPosted: Fri Nov 11, 2016 9:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

here we go Iran infers they will begin building nuclear weapons again.... Because of Trump hate talk..

Why isn't the headlines of this all over saying Iran will begin making nukes soon because of Trump election, today the world moves closer to a nuclear war. The nuclear clock more forward.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/iran-says-options-nuclear-deal-fails-131655030.html

Quote:
"But it doesn't mean we don't have other options if the USA unwisely decides to move away from its obligations under the agreement," he said when asked whether Tehran would start enrichment again if the Trump administration ditched the deal.

_________________
when good people stay silent the right wing are the only ones heard.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
isobars



Joined: 12 Dec 1999
Posts: 20935

PostPosted: Fri Nov 11, 2016 5:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Despite its failure to stop The Trump Train with mostly fabricated and overblown attacks on Trump -- admittedly an easy target -- the 96%-Left-leaning media BS-ed the gullible public even worse in one way: it scared the crap out of people who get their news from social media and the alphabet soup Pravda (aka ABCNBCCBSCNNPBSNPRMSNBCNYTLATetc) by leading them to believe that Trump is a monster rather than simply a NY-bred oaf whose mouth gets out in front of his brain. I'm just beginning to learn from man-in-the-street TV interviews and from friends that many ordinary 'Mericans are actually, personally AFRAID of him because of words he chose poorly and the lamestream media's distortions of them. I hear from Jews and blacks and browns and Muslims that they are in grave danger of being deported or jailed not just from/in the U.S. but EVEN FROM OTHER COUNTRIES by Trump (um, how's that work even if it were his intent?) just because of their skin color. They actually think their health care insurance will be abolished, they will be denied birth control, that all Muslims will be banned, that women will become chattel, that our very language and culture will become just obscene hate speech (um, what do they call Rap music, the blacks' "MoFo this and MoFo that you bitch", and mac's stupid and incessant "YER A RACIST!" tirades?), and that Trump will rape their preteen daughters.

I've begun asking some of these frightened people where they GET this crap, and the answer is usually "From his speeches". I then ask them to elaborate, and the best they can come up with is Daily Kos and CNN sound bites like, "Black lives matter!", "Hands Up; Don't Shoot", "My parents might not be allowed to keep supporting me until I'm 26 years old" (so put on your Big Boy pants, get a GD job, and buy your own GD health care insurance with yer OWN* GD money), and "Trump had a rape house full of pre-teen girls". This, from people who don't know the difference between Dana Perino and Nancy Pelosi, Gingrich and Reid, or Adolph Hitler and Billy Graham.

* Definition of "your OWN money": dollars YOU earned through YOUR labor, as opposed to dollars taken by force from other people who actually EARNED it and who owe you ZIP SQUAT BUPKUS because you've contributed NOTH-THING to THEIR lives.

So where DO these stupid Gen Xers, Yers, and Zers get their lame fears?

Mostly.
Stuff.
No.
Body.
Cares about.

Clinton.
News.
Network.
(as proved beyond any doubt by Wikileaks of their own emails)

aaaand

Every.
Thing.
Corrupt.

Even Hannity was shocked by the extent and depth of the collusion between virtually every broadcast, print, and especially cable TV "news" networks and this administration, now clearly established by Wikileaks exposure of their own stupidity. It is almost universal to varying degrees, including leaked debate questions, quotes doctored after the fact by Democrats, and top-down approval and/or orders to stop The Trump Train by any means possible.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
real-human



Joined: 02 Jul 2011
Posts: 14879
Location: on earth

PostPosted: Sat Nov 12, 2016 10:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

watch fox the rapist network for raping you will be paid 80 million for being a rapist.

for KGB style misinformation doctrination too...

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2010/12/13/928455/-

_________________
when good people stay silent the right wing are the only ones heard.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nw30



Joined: 21 Dec 2008
Posts: 6485
Location: The eye of the universe, Cen. Cal. coast

PostPosted: Sat Nov 12, 2016 11:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

This is just too rich, a major mea culpa from the New York Times no less.
Now they are reading the writing on the wall, and it isn't theirs, so funny and so deserved.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
New York Times publisher vows to 'rededicate' paper to reporting honestly

Published November 12, 2016

The publisher of The New York Times penned a letter to readers Friday promising that the paper would “reflect” on its coverage of this year’s election while rededicating itself to reporting on “America and the world” honestly.

Arthur O. Sulzberger Jr., the paper’s embattled publisher, appealed to Times readers for their continued support.

“We cannot deliver the independent, original journalism for which we are known without the loyalty of our subscribers,” the letter states.

New York Post columnist and former Times reporter Michael Goodwin wrote, "because it (The Times) demonized Trump from start to finish, it failed to realize he was onto something. And because the paper decided that Trump’s supporters were a rabble of racist rednecks and homophobes, it didn’t have a clue about what was happening in the lives of the Americans who elected the new president.

Sulzberger's letter was released after the paper’s public editor, Liz Spayd, took the paper to task for its election coverage. She pointed out how its polling feature Upshot gave Hillary Clinton an 84 percent chance as voters went to the polls.

She compared stories that the paper ran about President-elect Donald Trump and Clinton, where the paper made Clinton look functional and organized and the Trump discombobulated.

Spayd wrote, “Readers are sending letters of complaint at a rapid rate. Here’s one that summed up the feelings succinctly, from Kathleen Casey of Houston: “Now, that the world has been upended and you are all, to a person, in a state of surprise and shock, you may want to consider whether you should change your focus from telling the reader what and how to think, and instead devote yourselves to finding out what the reader (and nonreaders) actually think.”

She wrote about another reader who asked that the paper should focus on the electorate instead of “pushing the limited agenda of your editors.”

“Please come down from your New York City skyscraper and join the rest of us.”

Sulzberger—who insisted that the paper covered both candidates fairly-- also sent a note to staffers on Friday reminding the newsroom to “give the news impartially, without fear or favor.”

“But we also approach the incoming Trump administration without bias,” he said.

To read the letter~
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/11/12/new-york-times-publisher-vows-to-rededicate-itself-to-reporting-honestly.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
real-human



Joined: 02 Jul 2011
Posts: 14879
Location: on earth

PostPosted: Sun Nov 13, 2016 12:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

nw30 wrote:
This is just too rich, a major mea culpa from the New York Times no less.
Now they are reading the writing on the wall, and it isn't theirs, so funny and so deserved.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
New York Times publisher vows to 'rededicate' paper to reporting honestly

Published November 12, 2016

The publisher of The New York Times penned a letter to readers Friday promising that the paper would “reflect” on its coverage of this year’s election while rededicating itself to reporting on “America and the world” honestly.

Arthur O. Sulzberger Jr., the paper’s embattled publisher, appealed to Times readers for their continued support.

“We cannot deliver the independent, original journalism for which we are known without the loyalty of our subscribers,” the letter states.

New York Post columnist and former Times reporter Michael Goodwin wrote, "because it (The Times) demonized Trump from start to finish, it failed to realize he was onto something. And because the paper decided that Trump’s supporters were a rabble of racist rednecks and homophobes, it didn’t have a clue about what was happening in the lives of the Americans who elected the new president.

Sulzberger's letter was released after the paper’s public editor, Liz Spayd, took the paper to task for its election coverage. She pointed out how its polling feature Upshot gave Hillary Clinton an 84 percent chance as voters went to the polls.

She compared stories that the paper ran about President-elect Donald Trump and Clinton, where the paper made Clinton look functional and organized and the Trump discombobulated.

Spayd wrote, “Readers are sending letters of complaint at a rapid rate. Here’s one that summed up the feelings succinctly, from Kathleen Casey of Houston: “Now, that the world has been upended and you are all, to a person, in a state of surprise and shock, you may want to consider whether you should change your focus from telling the reader what and how to think, and instead devote yourselves to finding out what the reader (and nonreaders) actually think.”

She wrote about another reader who asked that the paper should focus on the electorate instead of “pushing the limited agenda of your editors.”

“Please come down from your New York City skyscraper and join the rest of us.”

Sulzberger—who insisted that the paper covered both candidates fairly-- also sent a note to staffers on Friday reminding the newsroom to “give the news impartially, without fear or favor.”

“But we also approach the incoming Trump administration without bias,” he said.

To read the letter~
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/11/12/new-york-times-publisher-vows-to-rededicate-itself-to-reporting-honestly.html


too funny, this from a paper that never really apologized for backing Bush to go to war in Iraq. What was her name the CIA agent in chief, Judith Miller.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/14/world/middleeast/iraq-war-kanan-makiya.html

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/05/26/world/from-the-editors-the-times-and-iraq.html

and added a paper that keeps maureen dowd a lifelong clinton hater on staff.

_________________
when good people stay silent the right wing are the only ones heard.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    iWindsurf Community Forum Index -> Politics, Off-Topic, Opinions All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 221, 222, 223 ... 275, 276, 277  Next
Page 222 of 277

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

myiW | Weather | Community | Membership | Support | Log in
like us on facebook
© Copyright 1999-2007 WeatherFlow, Inc Contact Us Ad Marketplace

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group