myiW Current Conditions and Forecasts Community Forums Buy and Sell Services
 
Hi guest · myAccount · Log in
 SearchSearch   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   RegisterRegister 
the big lie "the media is liberal"
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 21, 22, 23 ... 147, 148, 149  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    iWindsurf Community Forum Index -> Politics, Off-Topic, Opinions
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
stevenbard



Joined: 11 Nov 1993
Posts: 4337

PostPosted: Thu Oct 18, 2012 1:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well bajadean, both sides are full of shit aren't they? It's hard to admit the team you are rooting for is full of shit, but they both are. C'mon and admit it...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bajaDean



Joined: 02 Jul 2011
Posts: 1053
Location: on earth

PostPosted: Thu Oct 18, 2012 1:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

stevenbard wrote:
Well bajadean, both sides are full of shit aren't they? It's hard to admit the team you are rooting for is full of shit, but they both are. C'mon and admit it...



well I have to disagree... just your side embraces shit purposely as I have demonstrated just in this one lie. The so called liberal media is the perfect example of how ruthless and how big of liars the right wing is with nothing close from the liberal side. Fox and their lies fair and balanced and somehow you equate this to both sides. Obviously you see how well I have backed up my position here with not one comparable reasonable shed of documentation fro the right side.

The right side is just like they tell us the age of the world is, 5-9 thousand years and you have to believe them because of their religious faith. Well the facts can not be understood with people who are blinded by faith vs what has made the US the best in technology scientific methods.

Yes I understand also the psychology of the right saying both sides are so bad when they are trying to justify how pathetic their party is. And no I will not give you that rationalization the right tried to make.

That is why from the right we see the most horrific crimes and people in the history of mankind with really no liberal coming close. From people that are heros to this day to many in the right. From terrorists committing political crimes against liberals like mass murderers like eric rudolf, Tim McVeigh, Ted Bundy, anthrax mailer, and more, to the largest crimes, defense contractors, Bushes largest contributor Enron Ken Lay, to the largest vote fraud caught, the phone jammer, to Nixon such a criminal a hero to the republican party, (listen to his tapes and his crimes, they are unbelievable) to reagan and his supporting of pardons of his criminals for severe crims (and yes there are huge differences in crimes like speeding tickets from 5mph to 100mph in a school zone differentials to paying off people for breaking into offices to steal opponents s records) See the reagan Nixon and Bush 2 crimes are ok with ight wing. That is why having skin heads and KKK haters as part of their base is ok. Again the right wing does not remove these haters. They are all card carrying members of the right wing and it is acceptable. the reason why is the right needs their hate to exist. That is why I am glad there is a green party. I do not need some of the real extremists and do not respect them in my party. though we do not have the hate of the greens.

again Obama has a 400% increase in threats on him before he even took office...over any president in the history of the USA.. Note a pew study not long ago in a state in the south found that almost half of all conservatives said interacial marrage should be illegal. Not that they think it is wrong BUT ILLEGAL.

and this is what the republican party accepts... their base..

when you get rid of that hate trash I will will at least respect the values for which you claim to think you have.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bajaDean



Joined: 02 Jul 2011
Posts: 1053
Location: on earth

PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2012 10:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

http://www.forbes.com/sites/rickungar/2012/10/20/romney-family-investment-ties-to-voting-machine-company-that-could-decide-the-election-causes-concern/3/

Romney Family Investment Ties To Voting Machine Company That Could Decide The Election Causing Concern
Quote:
So, why would these individuals who serve on the board of directors of Hart Intercivic go out of their way to make a contribution to any political candidate given the critical importance of their company remaining above reproach when it comes to the political process? And why would those who run the company that owns Hart Intercivic be giving hundreds of thousands of dollars to a political candidate? And why would a political candidate and his family have a financial relationship with a company that owns a chunk of the voting machine company that will be counting the actual votes given to that political candidate or his opponent?

Keith Olbermann was suspended from his job at MSNBC for donating a couple hundred bucks to a local candidate that was a friend of his. Why? Because his employer required that journalists at the network stay free of having given such contributions to any candidate for all the obvious reasons.

http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/528.391723-Romney-buys-voting-machines-in-Ohio-Texas-Oklahoma-Washington-and-Colorado
Quote:

"Through a closely held equity fund called Solamere, Mitt Romney and his wife, son and brother are major investors in an investment firm called H.I.G. Capital. H.I.G. in turn holds a majority share and three out of five board members in Hart Intercivic, a company that owns the notoriously faulty electronic voting machines that will count the ballots in swing state Ohio November 7. Hart machines will also be used elsewhere in the United States.

In other words, a candidate for the presidency of the United States, and his brother, wife and son, have a straight-line financial interest in the voting machines that could decide this fall's election. These machines cannot be monitored by the public. But they will help decide who "owns" the White House."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bajaDean



Joined: 02 Jul 2011
Posts: 1053
Location: on earth

PostPosted: Thu Oct 25, 2012 8:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

In the so called liberal media I am watching MSNBC in the morning with the right wing partisan former elected representative joe scarboro who has 3 hours of time every morning in the so called liberal media and he has been on for how many years with 3 hours to himself. Well on that so called liberal media that only put a few partisan liberals in the last few years. well just heard brian willians give his partisan slant to the election when we are down to just a few days. He said he was in some state where he rigorously points out from his so called liberal point of view (sarcasm) that this is no 2008 electionů that were obama was talking he had a crowd of 5000 where in 2008 it would have been 50,000. Again this was his entire report not very flattering and not any of the points about romnesia. Not any talking points like in past elections where the media says the congress approval ratings has set new records and it means all the incumbents should be replaced. But his big news that no liberal would bring up was it is no 2008 and no 50k people.

Again the GE owned media, and remember recently the former chairman attacking obama that non-partisan so called liberal media head jack walsh. BTW jack was the star of the right wing corportists for his performance at running GE. Jack was the slasher of jobs and sending jobs out of the USA was his MO.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
isobars



Joined: 12 Dec 1999
Posts: 14605

PostPosted: Thu Oct 25, 2012 8:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Media bias?

The broadcast media and BSNBC whined that Ann Romney's outfit at the roast cost almost $1,500. Ya had to dig pretty deep and far elsewhere to learn that Michelle's cost twice as much ... ~200 times as big a chunk of their respective fortunes.

Benghazi.

Fast and Furious.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
windoggie



Joined: 22 Feb 2002
Posts: 2409

PostPosted: Thu Oct 25, 2012 10:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

isobars wrote:


Benghazi.

Fast and Furious.

How would you like your red herring cooked tonight sir? Benghazi Style or our new Fast and Furious quick fried?

_________________
/w\
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
isobars



Joined: 12 Dec 1999
Posts: 14605

PostPosted: Thu Oct 25, 2012 6:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Media bias? Look at the leftstream media's cooperation with the administration's coverup of Benghazi. Wouldn't honest, balanced, old-fashioned journalism decree thorough coverage of the facts so the public can decide what to believe and what matters to them, rather than hiding the story behind Snooki, another iPad release, a 1990s sitcom, some celeb's marriage, etc.? Kudos to CBS for releasing the absolutely damning emails that prove the administration's guilt in this global lie, but they've said little since then because it would end Obama's career.

The same goes for the struggling ... many global experts say doomed ... economy.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
keycocker



Joined: 10 Jul 2005
Posts: 3538

PostPosted: Thu Oct 25, 2012 9:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

While Baja is burying you guys with research proving the GOP owns the mainstream media, has anyone on the right here said one counter thing showing liberals own that industry?
NO
The reason?it doesnt matter to them. The real news is so full of facts counter to the horse pucky they adore that the real media must be all liberal lies. This idea is so critical to Limbaugh style brainwashing that conservatives are trained to die before giving up this excuse.

In a Fox poll 17% or their listeners said Fox was part of the liberal media controlled by Obama. They object to the shrinking part of Fox that is actual traditional news casting based on facts.
Dumber and dumber every day they listen.
They probably wonder why the absolute sure fact that Obama is actually the Devil isn't getting reported.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bajaDean



Joined: 02 Jul 2011
Posts: 1053
Location: on earth

PostPosted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 9:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

here is another great example.... Remember Gary Condit, the Levy case who the media went into a frenzy about. (note they later arrested someone else) remember how they would not let up on him....

Well did you know that congressman about the same time joe scarborough resigned from his congress position without ever saying why. And then not long after his staff worker female was found dead in his office. Under very suspicios circumstances, a runner who suposidily while working at her desk hit her head so hard that she died.

Amazing how these were about the same time as the Gary Condit who was innocent was going on but the media did nothing. Here was a partisan right wing republican who resigned under suspicious of adultery. His campaign worker who he allegedly was doing, dies under suspicious circumstances in his office when he was suppose to meet with some people.

no media coverage of it to get to the bottom of it. Not even pictures of the murdered girl. Try to find one on the internet, it is not possible.

And Joe gets a high paying job being an announcer with (delusional rightys who say it is liberal) MSNBC as his reward for resigning from his congress position. He gets a 3 hour job of posting right wing lies. what liberal would ever hire a creep like that or Imus whos spot Joe took.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
isobars



Joined: 12 Dec 1999
Posts: 14605

PostPosted: Wed Oct 31, 2012 8:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

stevenbard wrote:
Well bajadean, both sides are full of shit aren't they? It's hard to admit the team you are rooting for is full of shit, but they both are. C'mon and admit it...

Bajadean simply clips and pastes volumes of crap from left wing websites, then sprinkles some of his own rambling sentences over it and shotguns it at us under the guise of self-authorship.

One cue is pretty obvious: the clips are normal grammar, but his sprinkles are undiagrammable and often indecipherable because he leaves out whole words and phrases. He says dyslexia, but that has more to do with spelling than lack of cohesion. Another obvious cue is the sheer quantity of nonsensical, random-topic, obscure references to people and events no one ever heard of. I am dead certain that I could enter most of what he posts into plagiarism detection programs and find whole pages of crap mindlessly clipped from sites generically labeled something like alt.leftyloons.R.us, which is as valid and relevant as alt.rightyloons.is.us. There's just no point reading, let alone reacting, to either.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    iWindsurf Community Forum Index -> Politics, Off-Topic, Opinions All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 21, 22, 23 ... 147, 148, 149  Next
Page 22 of 149

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

myiW | Weather | Community | Membership | Support | Log in
like us on facebook
© Copyright 1999-2007 WeatherFlow, Inc Contact Us Ad Marketplace

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group