View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
isobars
Joined: 12 Dec 1999 Posts: 20936
|
Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2010 5:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Example? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
keycocker
Joined: 10 Jul 2005 Posts: 3598
|
Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2010 5:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Iso opinion for boggs....As cited in detail here months ago to the extent Boggsman had to agree, income tax cuts have dramatically increased revenue throughout world/U.S. history...
Boggs
"PLEASE stop misrepresenting me, over and over again>>>"
That was easy want to see a few more? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
isobars
Joined: 12 Dec 1999 Posts: 20936
|
Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2010 7:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
keycocker wrote: | Iso opinion for boggs....As cited in detail here months ago to the extent Boggsman had to agree, income tax cuts have dramatically increased revenue throughout world/U.S. history...
Boggs
"PLEASE stop misrepresenting me, over and over again>>>"
That was easy want to see a few more? |
Jeez, man ... Google it for yourself. Scores of analyses of historical data backing up my tax hike/cut statement surface immediately, and the ones I cited here last year led Boggsy to reverse his denial thereof. It's virtually universal with capital gains taxes, and generally valid with the larger inclusive category of income taxes, especially targeted taxes on the rich, such as Maryland’s recent loss of $363M do to exactly that.
I don't recall the details of a post I made a year or two ago that riles Boggs; maybe you or he cares enough to dig up the original discussion and clue me in. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
keycocker
Joined: 10 Jul 2005 Posts: 3598
|
Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2010 7:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Iso quotes a fake opinion for Boggs and then loses track of the fact we were discussing fake opinions, instead just defends the correctness of iso view.
Next he will move on to providing a fake opinion to another poster....
What is the point? It has been pointed out often that he is just arguing with himself.. but this not important to him.
At times I misrepresent the views of others-my response when corrected is a sincere apology. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
windoggi
Joined: 22 Feb 2002 Posts: 2743
|
Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2010 8:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Iso, I need a plonk list. I can't keep up with the game if I don't have a program. I need to see who you can respond to and who you can't. _________________ /w\ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
windoggi
Joined: 22 Feb 2002 Posts: 2743
|
Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2010 8:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Here's a puppy _________________ /w\ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
keycocker
Joined: 10 Jul 2005 Posts: 3598
|
Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2010 9:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks windoggie |
|
Back to top |
|
|
boggsman1
Joined: 24 Jun 2002 Posts: 9125 Location: at a computer
|
Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2010 8:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
isobars wrote: | keycocker wrote: | Iso opinion for boggs....As cited in detail here months ago to the extent Boggsman had to agree, income tax cuts have dramatically increased revenue throughout world/U.S. history...
Boggs
"PLEASE stop misrepresenting me, over and over again>>>"
That was easy want to see a few more? |
Jeez, man ... Google it for yourself. Scores of analyses of historical data backing up my tax hike/cut statement surface immediately, and the ones I cited here last year led Boggsy to reverse his denial thereof. It's virtually universal with capital gains taxes, and generally valid with the larger inclusive category of income taxes, especially targeted taxes on the rich, such as Maryland’s recent loss of $363M do to exactly that.
I don't recall the details of a post I made a year or two ago that riles Boggs; maybe you or he cares enough to dig up the original discussion and clue me in. |
My opinion was that the Cap gains tax reduction speeds the velocity of money and multiplies fast. This creates a revenue windfall for GOVT. I dont share the same opinion with incomes tax cuts. Im not against them, Im just not convinced they have a revenue impact. The example everybody likes to site is 2004-2005, but the revenue from Real estate profits dwarfed the revenue from tax cuts, so Im neutral on ISO's claim. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
coboardhead
Joined: 26 Oct 2009 Posts: 4303
|
Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2010 9:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
Boggs
Current long term gains is 15%. Would a prorated gain have any potential in your opinion?
I am thinking maybe 17% - 2 year gain and 20% on a one year gain?
Would this encourage long term investment and still promote risk taking?
Got to raise revenue somehow! It seems fair to spread this out across the board, including capital gains. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
isobars
Joined: 12 Dec 1999 Posts: 20936
|
Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2010 12:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Laffer curve.
Fair Tax.
Learn. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You cannot download files in this forum
|
|
|