View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
real-human
Joined: 02 Jul 2011 Posts: 14891 Location: on earth
|
Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2017 10:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
mrgybe wrote: | Boggsy, You are beyond redemption. Offensive commentary? Did you even read his memo? Whether you agree with it or not, it was polite, measured, thoughtful and had many supporting citations. It only offensive to those who are incapable of hearing a view that doesn't coincide with theirs. Don't discuss it, or "educate" him, just kick him out for having an opinion he expressed to a small group of colleagues, and others chose to spread widely. And you are right there with them with your stupid "Eric Bolling" comment, again designed to shut down any opposing view. Pathetic. |
I am sure Hitler had some very good well thought out arguments and was polite in his arguments too. That does not make them not in-human. Just ask Trump who the only books he read at his bedside were Hitlers. Trump is a hitler fan/understudy. It all came out in testimony in his first divorce.
https://www.vanityfair.com/magazine/2015/07/donald-ivana-trump-divorce-prenup-marie-brenner
https://www.deathandtaxesmag.com/285065/ivana-trump-donald-had-a-book-of-hitlers-speeches-for-light-bedtime-reading/
Ivana Trump: Donald had a book of Hitler’s speeches for light bedtime reading _________________ when good people stay silent the right wing are the only ones heard. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nw30
Joined: 21 Dec 2008 Posts: 6485 Location: The eye of the universe, Cen. Cal. coast
|
Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2017 12:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
real-human wrote: |
I am sure Hitler had some very good well thought out arguments and was polite in his arguments too. |
Tell me, Hitler expert, all about his carbon footprint while you're at it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
real-human
Joined: 02 Jul 2011 Posts: 14891 Location: on earth
|
Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2017 1:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
nw30 wrote: | real-human wrote: |
I am sure Hitler had some very good well thought out arguments and was polite in his arguments too. |
Tell me, Hitler expert, all about his carbon footprint while you're at it. |
Trump being the hitler under study..
you are as the Hitler understudy puts it dumber than a rock...
Quote: | Trump lobs another attack on 'fake news' and 'dumb as a rock' Mika Brzezinski in tweets |
_________________ when good people stay silent the right wing are the only ones heard. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mac
Joined: 07 Mar 1999 Posts: 17748 Location: Berkeley, California
|
Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2017 3:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mrgybe wrote: | That always does it for you doesn't it Boggsy? You are outraged by a 28 year old privately expressing his opinion, but evidence of real discrimination by Google..........meh who cares, look at the market cap. BTW, you didn't thank me for educating you on jobs with real pressure. Those little darlings at Google, who you believe thrive under the highest pressure in the country, are huddling together in trembling little support groups, so terrified that someone might say something nasty about them online, that they just can't pluck up the courage to have an internal meeting. Google has completely cocked this up. The company is successful despite its management, not because of it. |
Any time you troll iwindsurf with alt right talking points, you know you must be on the side of the angels. Jesus would approve. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nw30
Joined: 21 Dec 2008 Posts: 6485 Location: The eye of the universe, Cen. Cal. coast
|
Posted: Tue Aug 22, 2017 11:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
It's been a tough couple of weeks for the big warmers out there.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Big data finds the Medieval Warm Period – no denial here
Jennifer Marohasy
We began by deconstructing the six-proxy series from different geographic regions – series already published in the mainstream climate science literature. One of these, the Northern Hemisphere composite series begins in 50 AD, ends in the year 2000, and is derived from studies of pollen, lake sediments, stalagmites and boreholes.
Typical of most such temperature series, it zigzags up and down while showing two rising trends: the first peaks about 1200 AD and corresponds with a period known as the Medieval Warm Period (MWP), while the second peaks in 1980 and then shows decline. In between, is the Little Ice Age (LIA), which according to the Northern Hemisphere composite bottomed-out in 1650 AD. (Of course, the MWP corresponded with a period of generally good harvests in England – when men dressed in tunics and built grand cathedrals with tall spires. It preceded the LIA when there was famine and the Great Plague of London.)
Ignoring for the moment the MWP and LIA, you might want to simply dismiss this temperature series on the basis it peaks in 1980: it doesn’t continue to rise to the very end of the record: to the year 2000?
In fact, this decline is typical of most such proxy reconstructions – derived from pollen, stalagmites, boreholes, coral cores and especially tree rings. Within mainstream climate science the decline after 1980 is referred to as “the divergence problem”, and then hidden.
In denial of this problem, leading climate scientists have been known to even graft temperature measurements from thermometers onto the proxy record after 1980 to literally ‘hide the decline’. Phil Jones, the head of the Climate Research Unit, University of East Anglia, aptly described the technique as a ‘trick’.
Grafting thermometer data onto the end of the proxy record generally ‘fixes’ the problem after 1980, while remodelling effectively flattens the Medieval Warm Period.
There are, however, multiple lines of evidence indicating it was about a degree warmer across Europe during the MWP – corresponding with the 1200 AD rise in our Northern Hemisphere composite. In fact, there are oodles of published technical papers based on proxy records that provide a relatively warm temperature profile for this period. This was before the Little Ice Age when it was too cold to inhabit Greenland.
For the rest~
https://www.spectator.com.au/2017/08/big-data-finds-the-medieval-warm-period-no-denial-here/
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
And
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Scientists find 91 new volcanoes under Antarctic ice sheet
The volcanoes were not previously identified because their tops do not break through the surface of the Antarctic ice sheet.
Monday 14 August 2017
The largest volcanic region on Earth has been found thousands of meters below the surface of the ice sheet covering Antarctica.
A survey of the region of the West Antarctic Rift System has revealed 91 new volcanoes hidden within the ice.
The new volcanoes are on top of the 47 whose peaks are above the ice and were already known about.
The volcanoes range in height from 100m to a towering 3,850m tall.
Geologists say the range has similarities to east Africa's volcanic ridge, which was previously thought to have the densest concentration of volcanoes in the world.
For the rest~
http://news.sky.com/story/scientists-find-91-new-volcanoes-under-antarctic-ice-sheet-10986863
Always learning new stuff, and it will continue, making conclusions with limited knowledge is always fraught with risk. Sorry Al, again. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mac
Joined: 07 Mar 1999 Posts: 17748 Location: Berkeley, California
|
Posted: Tue Aug 22, 2017 11:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
NW actually discovered some facts, thinks he has an aha moment on climate change. Proves again he can't comprehend the basics of science. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nw30
Joined: 21 Dec 2008 Posts: 6485 Location: The eye of the universe, Cen. Cal. coast
|
Posted: Tue Aug 22, 2017 12:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
right on schedule mac |
|
Back to top |
|
|
MalibuGuru
Joined: 11 Nov 1993 Posts: 9300
|
Posted: Tue Aug 22, 2017 1:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mac wrote: | NW actually discovered some facts, thinks he has an aha moment on climate change. Proves again he can't comprehend the basics of science. |
🤣🤣, Mac your science is Al Gore's science that predicted farming in the arctic circle by now. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mrgybe
Joined: 01 Jul 2008 Posts: 5180
|
Posted: Tue Aug 22, 2017 2:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mac wrote: | NW actually discovered some facts, thinks he has an aha moment on climate change. Proves again he can't comprehend the basics of science. |
A perfect illustration of the reason so many are skeptical of those who shout the loudest about global warming. NW presents reasoned data which may or may not run counter to the "settled science" of warming. The instant response from the loudmouths "You're too stupid to understand". Thanks to Berkeley for reminding us why we have good cause to doubt. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mac
Joined: 07 Mar 1999 Posts: 17748 Location: Berkeley, California
|
Posted: Tue Aug 22, 2017 2:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My science is actually science. You and NW just know about trolling. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You cannot download files in this forum
|
|
|