| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
mac
Joined: 07 Mar 1999 Posts: 3361
|
Posted: Thu May 31, 2012 3:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
GT--My sister is still a Catholic, and active in the church. I think that at the grass roots level, with the number of Catholics dropping and the Vatican tone-deaf about the antagonism to women that much of their messages were, most parish priests and parishioners in America began to ignore the truly outlandish dogma of the church. Churches work very well as communities and as spiritual guides without the papal cloak of infallability. So you see common support for gay marriage as a civil matter, contraception, and abortion tolerance among the vast majority of Catholics.
I think this is very threatening to the Catholic hierarchy, as modernity is to the Muslim hierarchy. The conservatives have taken charge in the Vatican, and if you think the evidence doesn't support the view that they are interested primarily in power, you must be smoking crack. They have, so to speak, cracked down on dissident priests and tried to reassert their authority, a point mrgybe agrees with.
But there is something a bit more sinsister going on here if you are, like me, a supporter of strict separation between the church and the state. The Catholic bishops have, I believe quite consciously, become involved in a partisan attack on Obama. I believe that they are daring him to enforce the IRS limitations on political activities. Now the small evangelical churches have flaunted their claims that religious freedom allows them to back partisan candidates; many have become as much a part of the Republican Party as Fox news. All administrations, for the past 40 years, have threatened such churches with loss of their tax-exempt status, and the churches eventually back off--but the battle is constant. The Catholic Bishops are counting on their great size to intimidate the administration--and in the process help elect a President that is more favorable to school vouchers and hostile to gay rights. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
GURGLETROUSERS
Joined: 30 Dec 2009 Posts: 928
|
Posted: Thu May 31, 2012 5:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sorry Mac. Thoughtless of me to base my views on what happens over here, where our Church of England holds most sway.(Rest assured I've never taken drugs .. my vision of life goes beyond such nonsense.)
Our Church of England is very gentile. Half the bishops don't believe in God, and those who do seem quite defensive and apologetic, but I believe many of them are good people.
We had a past Bishop of Durham who quite honestly tried to rationalise the concepts of Heaven and Hell, and who dismissed the resurrection stories as conjuring tricks with bones. He was a figure of fun to many, but I felt his integrity and honesty shone through. As I've said before I came under the influence of one such devout person as a student who, like the bishop, wasn't able to give definitive answers, but who's faith remained intact.
My only contact with Catholics is with ordinary family people who seemingly take little notice of Rome, and its edicts. I often wonder why they remain catholics but, tradition and continuity play a large part in life over here, (not to mention bloody minded contrariness), and I'm sure they feel there is a purpose to life even though they, or I, have any idea what. So who's to say they are wrong! Even Solomon in all his wisdom couldn't come up with any better answer. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mrgybe
Joined: 01 Jul 2008 Posts: 2178
|
Posted: Thu May 31, 2012 7:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| GT, If you are looking for a balanced view on the Catholic Church or on the oil industry, I would not recommend the poster from Berkeley. I will not take the bait that he is hanging out, but I will comment that to state that the vast majority of Catholics are supportive of abortion is a lie. Practicing Catholics do not by a large margin. The views of those who were born Catholic but no longer practice the Catholic faith are of no consequence for the purpose of such a discussion. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
coboardhead
Joined: 26 Oct 2009 Posts: 1513
|
Posted: Thu May 31, 2012 8:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| mrgybe wrote: | | GT, If you are looking for a balanced view on the Catholic Church or on the oil industry, I would not recommend the poster from Berkeley. I will not take the bait that he is hanging out, but I will comment that to state that the vast majority of Catholics are supportive of abortion is a lie. Practicing Catholics do not by a large margin. The views of those who were born Catholic but no longer practice the Catholic faith are of no consequence for the purpose of such a discussion. |
I don't think Mac wrote that Catholics are supportive of abortion. He suggested they are tolerant of other peoples views regarding abortion. In my experience, this is an accurate representation of the attitude of my Catholic friends and family.
I while back, I posed the question...Should a Jehovah's Witness be allowed to practice as an ER Doc if he refuses to transfuse blood due to his religious beliefs? If not, why is this different than requiring a hospital ER to provide full treatment of rape victims, including the morning after pill? How about a Quaker enlisting in the National Guard and refusing active duty?
Last edited by coboardhead on Thu May 31, 2012 9:40 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mac
Joined: 07 Mar 1999 Posts: 3361
|
Posted: Thu May 31, 2012 9:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks CB. It is usually mrgybe that says "read my message." I've known for some time that he can't listen, it might upset his already made up mind.
I think that I have acurately distinguished the rank and file Catholic from those in the Knights of Columbus. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
coboardhead
Joined: 26 Oct 2009 Posts: 1513
|
Posted: Thu May 31, 2012 9:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| techno900 wrote: | Back to the basic issue, contraceptives covered by insurance.
Since this is part of Obama care, we must assume that everyone will have insurance so everyone will be able to partake in the benefits of birth control. Someone with more knowledge than me can fill in some missing or incorrect information.
1. Does it cover prophylactics, vasectomy and tubal ligation and if not, why not?
2. Since contraceptives are readily available and free for just about anyone that will ask, why include it in medical insurance?
3. Since many contraceptives are only available with prescriptions, will this make it easier to access them since everyone will have insurance?
4. Will it be harder to schedule an appointment to see a Dr. for a prescription because of the millions of newly insured?
5. Will clinics still provide free contraception with Obama care in place?
6. With co-pays and deductibles (assuming they will continue to exist in Obama care), will that make it any easier to access contraceptives?
7. If the free clinics stop offering contraceptives and the insured are stuck with co-pays and or deductibles, will this make it harder and more costly to access contraceptives? I assume that the clinics will figure this out and still offer free contraceptives, but who knows.
8. Will this program result in lower birth rates?
Someone here once said that the program is good because "contraception is a woman's health issue". To some extent I agree, but isn't it more of a health issue for men? Venereal disease, AIDS, etc. However, birth control doesn't seem to be a health issue for women unless they get pregnant, and then it's usually covered by insurance, so what am I missing?
As I said before, I see no reason why women's health problems related to hormone issues shouldn't be covered by insurance, but I don't see pregnancy prevention in the same light.
I know some of these issue have been discussed before, but I am just trying to simplify it with some basic questions. |
First, the pill is not free at Planned Parenthood. One must be relatively poor to qualify at most clinics.
Secondly, the ACA act provides pretty broad powers to the Dept. of HHS to determine what services are included as preventative. Broadly speaking, procedures that demonstrate prevention of diseases or provide significant health benefits are to be included within the preventative care requirements of insurance plans. Note that insurance companies do have input on this...at least that is the idea.
Will sterilization make the cut? I don't know.
Thirdly, the ACA is stressing a whole care patient treatment. The emphasis is to get folks to visit their primary care doc to receive screening for diseases and unhealthy lifestyles. For women, this visit would include a discussion of reproductive health. Preventing an unplanned pregnancy has significant health benefits. A prescription for contraceptives is often provided. It would seem rather uneconomical to go to the expense of providing all this service and stop short of covering the cost of the contraceptives.
Finally, will this cause a "run" on doctors? Short term...probably. Long term...not so much. Why? Because doctors will spend more time treating health than disease. An unplanned pregnancy can cost tens of thousands of dollars incuding significant time for the treating physician. "An ounce of prevention...."
Last edited by coboardhead on Thu May 31, 2012 10:44 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mrgybe
Joined: 01 Jul 2008 Posts: 2178
|
Posted: Thu May 31, 2012 10:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Let me rephrase my comment........stating that "abortion tolerance" is in evidence "among the vast majority of Catholics" is a lie. If anyone can produce one shred of evidence which supports the proposition that the vast majority of practicing Catholics are tolerant of abortion, I will withdraw my comment. I think we will all know how to interpret the absence of a response. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
isobars
Joined: 12 Dec 1999 Posts: 11471
|
Posted: Fri Jun 01, 2012 8:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
| coboardhead wrote: | I don't think Mac wrote that Catholics are supportive of abortion. He suggested they are tolerant of other peoples views regarding abortion. In my experience, this is an accurate representation of the attitude of my Catholic friends and family.
How about a Quaker enlisting in the National Guard and refusing active duty? |
I reported an Officer Training School Viet Nam era draftee to the commander after he boasted that he'd never lift a hand against another human, even to save his wife's life from a mugger. He was kicked out immediately.
I should have told his wife, too.
Tolerant? My seriously Catholic neighbor and good friend informed me I was destined for hell because I am not a Catholic. He told his less-devout sister she was going to hell, leading to a decades-long rift in the family. Many Catholics from multiple continents have confirmed to me they are also taught that in their church. I've found devout Mormons to be more tolerant than Catholics. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mrgybe
Joined: 01 Jul 2008 Posts: 2178
|
Posted: Fri Jun 01, 2012 9:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
| isobars wrote: | | Tolerant? My seriously Catholic neighbor and good friend informed me I was destined for hell because I am not a Catholic. He told his less-devout sister she was going to hell, leading to a decades-long rift in the family. Many Catholics from multiple continents have confirmed to me they are also taught that in their church. I've found devout Mormons to be more tolerant than Catholics. |
..........all of which merely reinforces two incontrovertible facts; that flimsy anecdotal evidence is worthless, and that there are not-so-smart people in every large organization. If anyone here cares, the Catholic Church does not teach that those who are not Catholic are destined for hell. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
boggsman1
Joined: 24 Jun 2002 Posts: 2973 Location: at a computer
|
Posted: Fri Jun 01, 2012 9:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
| mrgybe wrote: | | isobars wrote: | | Tolerant? My seriously Catholic neighbor and good friend informed me I was destined for hell because I am not a Catholic. He told his less-devout sister she was going to hell, leading to a decades-long rift in the family. Many Catholics from multiple continents have confirmed to me they are also taught that in their church. I've found devout Mormons to be more tolerant than Catholics. |
..........all of which merely reinforces two incontrovertible facts; that flimsy anecdotal evidence is worthless, and that there are not-so-smart people in every large organization. If anyone here cares, the Catholic Church does not teach that those who are not Catholic are destined for hell. |
My wife is Catholic...and whenever I blow her off to go windsurf, MTB, or ski, she says I'm going to hell! Thats TWO anecdotes.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You cannot download files in this forum
|
|
|