View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
h2oshots
Joined: 19 Apr 2008 Posts: 96 Location: SF Bay Area and beyond
|
Posted: Sun Feb 15, 2009 2:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
At a cove near SFO known as North Access, back in the 80's during low tide, a guy stepped on a 4'-5' leopard shark while sailing, the shark in turn started chasing him in the thigh deep muck. Some others caught it on film and the series of shots was hanging on the walls of a couple board shops for a while... DY87 had an eye to eye encouter with a great white directly under the GG Bridge in the 1990's....
With all the seals and seal lions hanging out at Pier 39, I'm surpised the
big fish have not established residency, but the reality is they don't seem to like murky water and fighting currents.
Fishermen routinely catch 4'-6' leopards all over the South Bay, but unless you step on one, chances of getting bit are greater on shore from an over protective dog chained to the owners vehicle than on the water...
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
diannesf
Joined: 19 Apr 2005 Posts: 74 Location: San Francisco
|
Posted: Sun Feb 15, 2009 11:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Eric,
I can't figure out what's funnier....that you remember that I saw that shark and was so freaked out that he 'rolled over and looked at me!!', which, for anyone wondering if you are just telling tall tales, well, believe me, it is really, really true....OR, that I would happen to be looking at the iwindsurf forums at 8:00 at night on a rainy Sunday and would see your post. Wow. Seriously, I still think about it, especially when I'm stalled under the gate. Especially if I FALL under the gate. Every single time!! But he (or she) wasn't that big...probably not that much bigger than me. OK, bigger than me, but I'm not that big. So it just makes for a good story...not anything life-threatening, although extremely startling and memorable. It does give meaning to the phrase, "Are you looking at ME???", that is more personal than the great movie starring DeNiro.
I think the point really is, that, of course there are sharks, and whales, and porpoises, and sturgeon, and jellyfish, and all sorts of creatures down there...it's their home! We have to share. The likelihood of an actual shark attack in the Bay has to be extremely low, so low that we shouldn't worry about it at all. So many other things to worry about....and perhaps many things that we can actually do something about....right??
Peace,
DianneSF, aka, DY87 from a long time ago!
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
dabull1
Joined: 19 Mar 1997 Posts: 556
|
Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 11:54 am Post subject: NO DEER TO FEAR! |
|
|
elenna wrote: | I'd worry more about the deer population. They cause several hundred fatalities a year. | Never fear Elenna! I'll drive the fabled Leo "Deer Hunter" Tundra up there and deal with that problem. The sharks, sorry, you're on your own! Bull, over and out!
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
theq
Joined: 10 Apr 2000 Posts: 707
|
Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 12:27 pm Post subject: Re: NO DEER TO FEAR! |
|
|
dabull1 wrote: | Never fear Elenna! I'll drive the fabled Leo "Deer Hunter" Tundra up there and deal with that problem. The sharks, sorry, you're on your own! Bull, over and out! |
I don't know, Bull. With the size fins that you and jpbassking use out there, you might have whittled the shark population down a bit. We know what you've done to the turtle population on Maui. Now all we need to witness is a bit of "Jousting with Jaws" out there. Be very careful that Whitey doesn't "chews" your weapon.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
mac
Joined: 07 Mar 1999 Posts: 17753 Location: Berkeley, California
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
naylor
Joined: 16 Feb 1999 Posts: 30
|
Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 1:50 pm Post subject: Re: Tiger in 1979 ? |
|
|
cmoffett wrote: | Just before I moved from San Francisco to southern CA in, I think 1979, a Tiger killed two scuba divers in the Bay down the peninsula. Killed them both right after they entered the water. It happens. |
That's seems like a pretty ridiculous statement because there are no Tiger Sharks any where near here and no one would go scuba diving in SF Bay especially "down the peninsula" beause you would have zero visibility.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
madspaniard
Joined: 23 May 2005 Posts: 380
|
Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 2:09 pm Post subject: Re: Tiger in 1979 ? |
|
|
naylor wrote: | no one would go scuba diving in SF Bay especially "down the peninsula" beause you would have zero visibility. |
unless you work for CalTrans and you are a diver/bridge inspector
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
h2oshots
Joined: 19 Apr 2008 Posts: 96 Location: SF Bay Area and beyond
|
Posted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 2:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
diannesf wrote: | Eric,
I can't figure out what's funnier....that you remember that I saw that shark and was so freaked out that he 'rolled over and looked at me!!', which, for anyone wondering if you are just telling tall tales, well, believe me, it is really, really true....OR, that I would happen to be looking at the iwindsurf forums at 8:00 at night on a rainy Sunday and would see your post. DianneSF, aka, DY87 from a long time ago! |
You can run, but you can't hide...
Remember that lil girl of mine you met so long ago? I think she may have you by an inch or two and 10-15 lbs...then there's the younger one with the attitude...some guy some day is gonna suffer...and then there is these guys..
Description: |
|
Filesize: |
366.52 KB |
Viewed: |
14687 Time(s) |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
SWE106
Joined: 14 Feb 2005 Posts: 264 Location: San Mateo
|
Posted: Fri Feb 20, 2009 3:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
No need to worry anymore, the economic crisis has taken care of the nr of shark attacks:
AP
updated 11:53 a.m. PT, Thurs., Feb. 19, 2009
Shark attacks drop; expert cites ailing economy
Fewer beach trips likely a factor, he says; so are declining shark numbers
JACKSONVILLE, Fla. - Shark attacks dipped to the lowest level in five years in 2008, a change that might have happened because the ailing economy kept cash-strapped vacationers away from beaches, a leading shark expert said Thursday.
There were 59 shark attacks around the world last year, compared to 71 in 2007, said George Burgess, an ichthyologist and director of the International Shark Attack File at the University of Florida's Museum of Natural History.
"I can't help but think that contributing to the reduction may have been the reticence of some people to take holidays and go to the beach for economic reasons," Burgess said in a news release.
Burgess said he expects the economy to help cause another decline in attacks in 2009, but over the long term, he expects a gradual increase from one decade to the next.
While the economy is a possible explanation, shark populations also have declined due to commercial fishing. In some areas, the number of sharks is down to 10 percent of the original populations.
"We've got a lot less sharks than in the past," Burgess said.
There were four fatal attacks in 2008, which is about average, Burgess said. Only one death was reported in 2007, a two-decade low. Two of the deaths were in Mexico, one was in Australia and one was in the United States.
The number of shark attacks in the United States dropped from 50 in 2007 to 41 last year, Burgess said. Of those, 32 were in Florida, the same as the previous year, followed by North Carolina and South Carolina with three each; Hawaii with two and California with one. Surfers accounted for 57 percent of the attacks, followed by 36 percent for swimmers and waders and 8 percent for divers, Burgess said.
Volusia County, Fla., continued its dubious distinction of the world's shark bite capital with 22 attacks, its highest yearly total since 2001. Most of them were in the surf haven of New Smyrna Beach on the central Atlantic coast.
SOURCE: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29283441/
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
johnl
Joined: 05 Jun 1994 Posts: 1330 Location: Hood River OR
|
Posted: Fri Feb 20, 2009 8:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
H2oShots,
They have a video contest every basketball game for the best dressed CAL dog. You might want to enter yours. I get 15% of whatever you win
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You can attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
|
|