| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
real-human
Joined: 02 Jul 2011
Posts: 14892
Location: on earth
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
real-human
Joined: 02 Jul 2011
Posts: 14892
Location: on earth
|
 Posted: Mon Mar 25, 2024 12:27 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
of course he voted dem, he was selling electric vehicles.... who was his customers and those helping him in government... daaaa He NEVER gave dems much money is the key. When he bought twitter and fired the people working on keeping the russians and chinese and liars out he fired those responsible for doing that. So he basically is giving the repukes 100s of millions in benefits of the lies. and his statements now also amplified with his paid for propaganda.
remember the chinese can put him out of business in one day. They control the Lithium market.
Remember the russians can put him out of business in one day, all they have to do is shoot down a few of the critical satellites and his starlink will be over. For that matter just say they will. Note Musk stopped allowing Ukraine live data about and use in Russia. That did not happen because Muck Rat decided to do it, it obviously was at the russians telling him to do so or else. Message was conveyed.
Musk rat is controlled by the russians and chinese.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/elon-musk-says-he-used-to-vote-100-dem-but-now-thinks-the-us-needs-a-red-wave-to-save-it/ar-BB1ksRPm?ocid=winp2fptaskbar&cvid=ddce9cee31e44efbccbdcc660a0b347b&ei=17
Elon Musk says he used to vote '100% Dem,' but now thinks the US needs a 'red wave' to save it
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
real-human
Joined: 02 Jul 2011
Posts: 14892
Location: on earth
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Still-Waters
Joined: 21 Nov 2023
Posts: 134
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 27, 2024 5:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Apparently Musk deleted accounts of those impersonating. Sad day for the trans community. I'm wondering if the child groomer party will have a meltdown over that one. I guess if China was calling the shots, then they'd be fully on board with dumbing down the population with gender confusion fully supported by none other than the pervert child groomer party. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
real-human
Joined: 02 Jul 2011
Posts: 14892
Location: on earth
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 27, 2024 8:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Still-Waters wrote: | | Apparently Musk deleted accounts of those impersonating. Sad day for the trans community. I'm wondering if the child groomer party will have a meltdown over that one. I guess if China was calling the shots, then they'd be fully on board with dumbing down the population with gender confusion fully supported by none other than the pervert child groomer party. |
where is your proof...
_________________
when good people stay silent the right wing are the only ones heard. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Still-Waters
Joined: 21 Nov 2023
Posts: 134
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 27, 2024 8:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
| real-human wrote: | | Still-Waters wrote: | | Apparently Musk deleted accounts of those impersonating. Sad day for the trans community. I'm wondering if the child groomer party will have a meltdown over that one. I guess if China was calling the shots, then they'd be fully on board with dumbing down the population with gender confusion fully supported by none other than the pervert child groomer party. |
where is your proof... |
Of child grooming? Oh that’s easy, mister waffle king / child sniffer himself.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hh0PBr6ZUN0 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
real-human
Joined: 02 Jul 2011
Posts: 14892
Location: on earth
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 04, 2024 1:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
so ridiculous Elon is another delusional control freak...
again his saying trumps fine claims he is freeing the world from censorship by buying twitter, is unfair. then he takes a group to court that researches internet censorship/dis-information that finds Twitter in chiefs company is doing that to liberal causes so Musk sues them and judge rules that it is Elon bulling them with his trillion dollars to shut up their free speech.
https://www.aclu.org/press-releases/federal-judge-dismisses-elon-musks-x-lawsuit-against-nonprofit-researchers
Federal Judge Dismisses Elon Musk’s X Lawsuit Against Nonprofit Researchers
| Quote: | SAN FRANCISCO — A California federal court judge today dismissed Elon Musk-led X’s claims that the Center for Countering Digital Hate, Inc. (CCDH) violated X’s terms of service when it used automated data collection — known as scraping — to inform research criticizing X for allowing what CCDH deemed disinformation to remain on the platform.
The American Civil Liberties Union, the ACLU Foundation of Northern California, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, and the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University filed a friend-of-the-court brief in the case, arguing that private companies should not be allowed to wield breach of contract claims as a weapon to punish criticism, and to secure damages stemming solely from claimed reputational harm resulting from that criticism.
“The court’s ruling reaffirms that vital First Amendment protections apply to researchers and journalists who use digital tools like scraping to inform the public about the practices of powerful platforms,” said Esha Bhandari, deputy project director of the ACLU’s Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project.
In this case, CCDH engaged in scraping to inform the public of instances when X failed to remove posts that CCDH deemed dis- and mis-information, despite evidence the content violated X’s content guidelines. X accused CCDH of obtaining its data illegally, and claimed that its reports drove advertisers away from the site. The ACLU and its legal partners argued in its brief, however, that scraping when done in the context of public interest research is part and parcel of the subsequent public interest speech it enables.
The court dismissed X’s suit, writing in its opinion that efforts to use an anti-scraping contract term to bypass the high standard for defamation claims was impermissible and noting that the lawsuit was about punishing CCDH for its speech criticizing X.
“This is an important decision that sees Elon Musk’s lawsuit for what it is—an effort to punish his critics for constitutionally protected speech and to deter researchers from studying his platform,” said Alex Abdo, litigation director of the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University. “Society needs reliable and ethical research into social media platforms, and often that research relies on being able to study publicly available posts. Musk’s lawsuit imperiled that kind of research by threatening it with ruinous liability, but thankfully, the court shut down his case.”
The speech of research organizations like CCDH. as well as academics and journalists — in many instances made possible only by scraping — has shed necessary light on a panoply of concerns that powerful social media platforms have failed to independently monitor and correct, and has provided crucial information for regulators to take enforcement action. Such public interest research serves as a key accountability mechanism to reveal the platforms’ content moderation choices and privacy policies and practices.
“The district court rightly saw through X’s chilling attempt to twist the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act and contract law to retaliate against a nonprofit that published critical reports regarding hateful content on X,” said Cindy Cohn, executive director of the Electronic Frontier Foundation. “The First Amendment and California’s anti-SLAPP statute protect anyone who scrapes publicly available websites and publishes newsworthy information about the data.”
“This lawsuit was nothing more than a vain attempt to stymie independent research into an influential social media platform. The court’s decision today is a much-needed reminder that free speech includes the right to investigate and criticize Elon Musk and X,” said Jake Karr, deputy director of NYU’s Technology Law & Policy Clinic, which helped prepare the friend-of-the-court brief. “And it serves as a clear example for powerful corporations and individuals in the tech industry—it’s not so easy to abuse the U.S. legal system to silence criticism and evade public accountability.” |
_________________
when good people stay silent the right wing are the only ones heard. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
real-human
Joined: 02 Jul 2011
Posts: 14892
Location: on earth
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 22, 2024 12:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/elon-musk-kicks-against-military-aid-to-ukraine-amid-ongoing-russia-war/ss-AA1npp9i?ocid=00000000&cvid=377175b75d4c433aa34f9aefdd015b5b&ei=4
Elon Musk Kicks Against Military Aid to Ukraine Amid Ongoing Russia War
| Quote: | | Elon Musk, the wealthiest individual globally, recently advocated for the cessation of United States aid to Ukraine amid the ongoing conflict with Russia. Musk asserted that continuing financial assistance was futile and expressed confidence in Russia's eventual triumph. These sentiments surfaced during a Twitter Spaces gathering featuring Republican senators and former GOP presidential contender Vivek Ramaswamy. |
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/australian-leaders-attack-egotistical-billionaire-elon-musk-as-x-refuses-to-takedown-church-stabbing-posts/ar-AA1nqaQ5?ocid=winp2fptaskbarhover&cvid=dc23368821394463e7753b41a584cc17&ei=31
Australian Leaders Attack ‘Egotistical Billionaire’ Elon Musk As X Refuses To Takedown Church Stabbing Posts
| Quote: | Australian government officials, including Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, and opposition leaders, attacked Elon Musk and his social media platform X on Monday after the company refused to comply with a government order to take down posts and videos about a knife attack on a church bishop that police have deemed a terror attack.
Last week, X’s Global Government Affairs team said it would legally challenge an order by Australia’s eSafety Commissioner to take down violent and offensive posts of the attack, arguing the commission did not have “the authority to dictate what content X’s users can see globally.”
Speaking to reporters in Canberra on Monday, Albanese said: “I find it extraordinary that X chose not to comply and are trying to argue their case,” adding that the issue wasn’t about freedom of expression but rather dangerous misinformation that can be “weaponized.”
Musk targeted the country’s eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant on X over the weekend, calling her the “Australian censorship commissar,” claiming her agency was demanding “*global* content bans,” and sharing a post accusing her of being an activist trying to “police the internet” and “censor debate.”
In an interview on Monday, Australian Environment Minister Tanya Plibersek said Musk was an “egotistical billionaire” who thinks it’s more “important for him to show whatever he wants on X…than to respect the victims of the crimes.”
The government has found backing from the leader of the country’s opposition coalition, Peter Dutton, who accused social media companies of acting “above the law” and offered support for legislation to crack down on misinformation. |
_________________
when good people stay silent the right wing are the only ones heard. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum
|
|
|
Search
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Register
