| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
mac
Joined: 07 Mar 1999
Posts: 17748
Location: Berkeley, California
|
 Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2018 3:13 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
Matty and NW will ignore evidence. They are excited that the White House held back all the papers that showed he was all in on torture, and all in on indicting a President--as long as it was Clinton--until Trump came along.
He is the elite that Trump ran against, who's sold his soul for a seat. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nw30
Joined: 21 Dec 2008
Posts: 6485
Location: The eye of the universe, Cen. Cal. coast
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2018 3:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| What evidence? There is nothing to ignore. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MalibuGuru
Joined: 11 Nov 1993
Posts: 9300
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2018 4:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| nw30 wrote: | | What evidence? There is nothing to ignore. |
He means this kind of evidence...
4Chan is claiming credit for pranking Porny Daniel’s scumbag lawyer Michael Avenatti with a fake Kavanaugh witness using a burner phone: |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MalibuGuru
Joined: 11 Nov 1993
Posts: 9300
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2018 4:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Is this Mac or Dean? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mat-ty
Joined: 07 Jul 2007
Posts: 7850
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2018 4:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| coboardhead wrote: | | mat-ty wrote: | | swchandler wrote: | Actually mat-ty, Kavanaugh is being revealed to be the cad that many women recognize.
Is he really the innocent guy that Republicans want to present, or is he a darker character that his accusers cast him as based on an arguably questionable history, even if it all happened many years ago? This week will definitely challenge him in the arena, and rightly so.
Outside of his accused sexual youthful indiscretions, it's his political bias and related fervor that worries most thoughtful folks. One only needs to reflect on his past adamancy and involvement trying to take President Bill Clinton down. It is said that what goes around comes around. I certainly hope so.
With respect to Merrick Garland, what Republicans did clearly wasn't a historical norm, and if you were honest about the situation, you would admit it. Yet, given your corrupt and twisted viewpoint, I won't hold my breath. |
It has happened three times in history, do some homework shithead. You don't get to ignor the history that conflicts with your position.
Don't let the facts get in the way of your hatred.
Ford is a left wing cunt with a weak story with little facts and ZERO WITNESSES. The lefts calls now for an FBI investigation are comical and not even remotly possible after the way the left has handled the info and accusations.
If the left truly cared about this woman they would have taken the original letter to law enforcement so there could have been a fair investagation.
Instead they decided to keep it for a last minute political weapon. Hardly in Mrs Ford best interest.........disgraceful and no surprise you would support it.
Liberal scum making asses of themselves once agian.. |
Sorry Matty. You are wrong. Never in history has a party refused to hold hearings on the Supreme Court nominee. The Senate may perform within their constitutional duty and hold hearings. There is not a timeline on those. So, they can run the clock out and that has happened (and, might happen in this case with Kavanaugh).
But, Mitch McConnel would not even consider Obama's appointment. He, simply, refused. He did not want his party to have members that voted against a popular President's nominee. So, he cheated.
Let's take this a step further. There is a good chance Kavanaugh will not be approved. There is a slight chance the Democrats take the Senate. What would you say if the Senate Majority leader was a Democrat and refused to even consider ANY Trump appointment until after the 2020 election?
We may get to hear your response to this in November. |
Garland had zero chances of being nominated and McConnell was saving the country from a useless circus... We also never had a SCJ drop dead unexpectedly 7 months from a Presidential election. Dems would have done the same exact thing under the same circumstances... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
swchandler
Joined: 08 Nov 1993
Posts: 10588
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2018 5:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mat-ty, can't you count? Scalia died February 13, 2016, and as we all know the election was on November 8th. Want to try again?
"Garland had zero chances of being nominated..."
Now you are sounding stupid mat-ty. Merrick Garland was nominated by President Obama, so his nomination for the Supreme Court is clearly not in question. Obviously Garland wasn't approved, because McConnell patently refused to consider him for highly specious reasons.
In my view, if McConnell hadn't unilaterally shut the review and approval process down for nearly a year, Garland would have had a good chance of being approved, because there was nothing notable in his past that would have shot him down.
Last edited by swchandler on Tue Sep 25, 2018 6:11 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MalibuGuru
Joined: 11 Nov 1993
Posts: 9300
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2018 5:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Of all the millions of lawyers the bitch could find, it was one of Hillary's buddies |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mat-ty
Joined: 07 Jul 2007
Posts: 7850
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2018 6:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| swchandler wrote: | mat-ty, can't you count? Scalia died February 13, 2016, and as we all know the election was on November 8th. Want to try again?
"Garland had zero chances of being nominated..."
Now you are sounding stupid mat-ty. Merrick Garland was nominated by President Obama, so his nomination for the Supreme Court is clearly not in question. Obviously Garland wasn't approved, because McConnell patently refused to consider him for highly specious reasons.
In my view, if McConnell hadn't unilaterally shut the review and approval process down for nearly a year, Garland would have had a good chance of being approved, because there was nothing notable in his past that would have shot him down. |
There was no way the Republican Senate would have voted in Obamas third pick under those circumstances you stupid old shit.....never would have happened.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
swchandler
Joined: 08 Nov 1993
Posts: 10588
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2018 6:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You are foolishly rationalizing mat-ty, because we will all know what really happened. McConnell gave the finger to America and refused to cooperate. That's what happened. But I'm left thinking that he's your guy in making America great again.
Did you like his latest 12+ minute speech to the Senate on the Kavanaugh circus? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
real-human
Joined: 02 Jul 2011
Posts: 14890
Location: on earth
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2018 7:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| MalibuGuru wrote: | | Of all the millions of lawyers the bitch could find, it was one of Hillary's buddies |
well all of trumps are in jail you moron....
_________________
when good people stay silent the right wing are the only ones heard. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum
|
|
|
Search
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Register
