The pope on income re-distribution

nw30 · Posted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 7:50 pm Post subject:

mac~
No, it makes the New York Times out to what they always have been, nothing more than a left wing hack rag, that helped get BHO re-elected by buying and continually publishing his lies about Obamacare.
It wasn't until the shit hit the fan with the dragout of Obamacare did they start running CYA stories about it.
When writing about politics, I will never consider the NYT a credible source, no better than Susan Rice.
That my prerogative, and I'm sticking with it.

swchandler · Joined: 08 Nov 1993 Posts: 10588

I have to ask, what major newspapers do you think are top flight? Why not list your top three, include your favorite opinion writers? Spare me the internet news scene.

keycocker · Joined: 10 Jul 2005 Posts: 3598

Some folks have never read a single article in the New York Times.
Their expertise on the contents comes from walking by the paper on a newsstand several times.
Same for the Benghazi article.
Not speaking of NW .he never says so we don't know whether his opinion is based on that

pueno · Joined: 03 Mar 2007 Posts: 2807

keycocker · Joined: 10 Jul 2005 Posts: 3598

Pueno,
I am not sure anyone actually believes that, but there are many folks who do not care.

pueno · Joined: 03 Mar 2007 Posts: 2807

keycocker · Joined: 10 Jul 2005 Posts: 3598

Says you.

isobars · Joined: 12 Dec 1999 Posts: 20935

The guy who wrote the recent NYT "It was the video" joke is the same guy who advanced that asinine theory in the beginning. Not only is he simply covering his biased ass, but he's also covering Hillary's (he didn't even mention her!), deliberately omitting the Pentagon's official finding that this group is a spawn of Al Qaeda (as though anyone cares exactly which radical Islam gang punched these attackers' tickets), and simply lying about the level of advance prep required to pull off this attack. His management let him print it because it helps their candidate distance herself from the self-destructive, incompetent, lawless boobs in the White House.

Notice that Susan Rice said just this week that she still stands behind her post-Benghazi rant about the stupid movie. That's probably why Kerry, not she, is the Secretary of State.

mac · Posted: Sat Jan 04, 2014 11:46 am Post subject:

NW will believe any Murdoch paper, or any whacko right wing Bircher site, as long as it attacks Obama. The truth is irrelevant. A newspaper? One that requires fact checking? Not a chance.

the idiocy of the Fox world can never be underestimated.

pueno · Joined: 03 Mar 2007 Posts: 2807