View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
MalibuGuru
Joined: 11 Nov 1993 Posts: 9293
|
Posted: Wed Oct 30, 2013 7:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
pueno wrote: | stevenbard wrote: | The rich are getting richer under Obama but the little guy is again getting the shaft. |
If that's really true, then Mitt and the right must LOVE Obama.
. |
Yes Pueno, you finally got it right. The moguls, hedge fund operators, Warren Buffet, and George Soros love this guy. They fund him, they promote him, and they profit by him. I've made a ton of money because of Obama. So has Boggs. That doesn't make him good for our future. I'm afraid of the coming crash because of his policies. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
windoggi
Joined: 22 Feb 2002 Posts: 2743
|
Posted: Wed Oct 30, 2013 8:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Just what is it that you want from this guy? _________________ /w\ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mac
Joined: 07 Mar 1999 Posts: 17743 Location: Berkeley, California
|
Posted: Wed Oct 30, 2013 8:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The right just keeps screaming, and they can't think of a coherent line. Now look at this for a second:
I Quote: | nsurers Oppose Obamacare Extension as Danger to Profits... |
So healthcare costs have been going up very rapidly--in part because of obscene profits for insurance companies and big pharma. And reducing those profits to something reasonable is a bad thing? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
MalibuGuru
Joined: 11 Nov 1993 Posts: 9293
|
Posted: Thu Oct 31, 2013 12:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
If you read it properly, it is the extension they are worried will cut their profits. IOW's they anticipate making way more money because of the law, and are worried if it is postponed they will lose profits. How does that help the consumer?? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pueno
Joined: 03 Mar 2007 Posts: 2807
|
Posted: Thu Oct 31, 2013 4:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
stevenbard wrote: | They fund him, they promote him, and they profit by him. |
Really? The Koch Brothers fund Obama? Murdock approves of Obama? The military-industrial complex (CHENEY) promotes Obama?
Who'd've thunk it?
Tell me, Mr. B...... what space-time universe do you come from and how'd you get here?
. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
isobars
Joined: 12 Dec 1999 Posts: 20935
|
Posted: Thu Oct 31, 2013 8:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
And now the "most transparent administration in history" is pressuring the insurance industry to suppress news of its cancelled policies ... >2,000,000 and rapidly counting. Jay Carney's reaction? Oh, that couldn't be.
The left is being played like a hand flute. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
windoggi
Joined: 22 Feb 2002 Posts: 2743
|
Posted: Thu Oct 31, 2013 11:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
hand flute? _________________ /w\ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
uwindsurf
Joined: 18 Aug 2012 Posts: 968 Location: Classified
|
Posted: Thu Oct 31, 2013 11:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
Right hand flute or left hand flute? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
MalibuGuru
Joined: 11 Nov 1993 Posts: 9293
|
Posted: Thu Oct 31, 2013 11:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
pueno wrote: | stevenbard wrote: | They fund him, they promote him, and they profit by him. |
Really? The Koch Brothers fund Obama? Murdock approves of Obama? The military-industrial complex (CHENEY) promotes Obama?
Who'd've thunk it?
Tell me, Mr. B...... what space-time universe do you come from and how'd you get here?
. |
You can mention 2 guys? Wow...today in the news
GOLDMAN SACHS pays Hillary nearly half a million -- for two speeches?
This is an every day occurrence for Obama and Clinton. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mac
Joined: 07 Mar 1999 Posts: 17743 Location: Berkeley, California
|
Posted: Thu Oct 31, 2013 12:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
See Bard, you can post a criticism of Hillary that is not misogynist. I agree with it. The Clinton foundation is indeed too cozy with big money businesses and people. While the Foundation does some very good things, and both Hillary and Bill are very smart, their ability to recognize conflicts of interest radar seems to be broken. Raising too much money for politics for too many years has compromised them both. But despite that, and his sleazy personal ethics around sexual behavior, Bill was an excellent President. Bush II, although he may have been a decent man, was a terrible President in almost every way.
But you are unhinged when it comes to Obama. By all reputable accounts, he is a much more principled man than the last four Presidents, and is uneasy with raising money from, and granting ready access, to the oligarchs. You've got it 100% wrong. You are also wrong about oversight of the banks--its taken a long time, and has been too cautious, but the DOJ, under Obama's direction, is taking on the big banks and exacting significant civil settlements for their behavior. Something that Bush II actually prevented. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You cannot download files in this forum
|
|
|