View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
pueno
Joined: 03 Mar 2007 Posts: 2807
|
Posted: Tue Aug 06, 2013 6:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mr. Hypocrisy wrote: |
1. It rewards leeches.
|
Speaking of leeches, Mikey, how are your disability payments doing?
. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
joew
Joined: 18 Jul 1999 Posts: 156
|
Posted: Tue Aug 06, 2013 7:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So much for civil discourse.It 's come to this , now we taunt veterans about the retirement and disability benefits they have earned?
Last edited by joew on Tue Aug 06, 2013 8:06 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
isobars
Joined: 12 Dec 1999 Posts: 20935
|
Posted: Tue Aug 06, 2013 8:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Do you go to strip clubs expecting to hear sermons? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mac
Joined: 07 Mar 1999 Posts: 17747 Location: Berkeley, California
|
Posted: Tue Aug 06, 2013 10:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Techno--still haven't gotten the hang of that reading thing? I said the NSP program--at $1 billion--doesn't amount to a hill of beans. The phone system, of course, is not in the Federal budget.
The best term I've heard for the Tea Party is governing by tantrum. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
swchandler
Joined: 08 Nov 1993 Posts: 10588
|
Posted: Tue Aug 06, 2013 11:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
joew, did you know that isobars entire military service career was at a non-combat desk job here in the states? His military pension aside, working in an office has certainly raised a lot of questions about how he become disabled on the job, particularly since he has bragged on and on about racing about and crashing motorcycles at high speed on the desert for years. It probably wouldn't be such a big deal if he didn't have so many negative things to say about other Americans supposedly "gaming the system" receiving some kind of financial assistance. Such an openly disrespectful attitude regarding the plight of others tends to invite focus and criticism, don't you think?
That said, I have to say that pueno tends to over do it at times. In the end though, maybe pueno would give isobars a break if he backed off and mellowed out a bit. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
KGB-NP
Joined: 25 Jul 2001 Posts: 2856
|
Posted: Wed Aug 07, 2013 5:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
swchandler wrote: | joew, did you know that isobars entire military service career was at a non-combat desk job here in the states? His military pension aside, working in an office has certainly raised a lot of questions about how he become disabled on the job, particularly since he has bragged on and on about racing about and crashing motorcycles at high speed on the desert for years. It probably wouldn't be such a big deal if he didn't have so many negative things to say about other Americans supposedly "gaming the system" receiving some kind of financial assistance. Such an openly disrespectful attitude regarding the plight of others tends to invite focus and criticism, don't you think?
That said, I have to say that pueno tends to over do it at times. In the end though, maybe pueno would give isobars a break if he backed off and mellowed out a bit. |
I love how you make this big long statement about Isobars and then tell Pueno to mellow out. Is what you said better, worse or also "openly disrespectful"? Hmmmm, openly disrespectful attitude regarding....who?
Last edited by KGB-NP on Wed Aug 07, 2013 8:21 am; edited 2 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pueno
Joined: 03 Mar 2007 Posts: 2807
|
Posted: Wed Aug 07, 2013 5:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
swchandler wrote: | ...give isobars a break if he backed off and mellowed out a bit. |
Oh, you mean like he gives others a break?
Mikey's an easy, easy target. He wears a mile-high flashing sign that says, "I'm a hypocrite. I scream about others who get stuff while I myself get stuff." |
|
Back to top |
|
|
techno900
Joined: 28 Mar 2001 Posts: 4161
|
Posted: Wed Aug 07, 2013 9:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
Mac said: Quote: | Techno--still haven't gotten the hang of that reading thing? I said the NSP program--at $1 billion--doesn't amount to a hill of beans. |
Guilty, I had it wrong. I tend to scan your posts since they are a bit wordy, so I may occasionally miss something. Regardless, because our country's budget is so huge, it's unfortunate that we have come to think that 1 billion doesn't amount to a hill of beans regardless of the program.
I also wonder if the FCC's management costs for the Lifeline program are covered by the collected "fees" from the phone companies? I suspect that there are some taxpayers dollars funding part of this program. Not a biggie, but just saying......... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mrgybe
Joined: 01 Jul 2008 Posts: 5180
|
Posted: Wed Aug 07, 2013 10:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
Remember the numerous occasions the President said that he would "scour the budget, line by line" to root out "every cent of waste". I'm sure he will get to the three fold increase in the free phone program shortly. As for this canard that "fees" aren't taxes.....that is a smoke screen. So called middle class tax cuts are being overwhelmed by a multitude of increases elsewhere, including "fees" at a Federal and local level. Virtually everything we pay for now has some "fee" attached to it. We are told that a cell 'phone is so vital to everyday existence that we have to give them away to those who apparently can't afford them. Yet when we grumble about the exploding cost we are told that having a cell 'phone is our choice, if we don't want to pay the "fee" don't use a cellphone. We can do without. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pueno
Joined: 03 Mar 2007 Posts: 2807
|
Posted: Wed Aug 07, 2013 12:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mrgybe wrote: | Remember the numerous occasions the President said that he would "scour the budget, line by line" to root out "every cent of waste". I'm sure he will get to the three fold increase in the free phone program shortly. As for this canard that "fees" aren't taxes.....that is a smoke screen. So called middle class tax cuts are being overwhelmed by a multitude of increases elsewhere, including "fees" at a Federal and local level. Virtually everything we pay for now has some "fee" attached to it. We are told that a cell 'phone is so vital to everyday existence that we have to give them away to those who apparently can't afford them. Yet when we grumble about the exploding cost we are told that having a cell 'phone is our choice, if we don't want to pay the "fee" don't use a cellphone. We can do without. |
Mr. G., you've sidestepped the real issue here. Yes, we can quibble about "taxes" vs. "fees," but that's a distraction. What is the abuse, and who's causing it?
The abuse is unqualified or undeserving people receiving something for nothing... something that you paid for, in part. None of us like that, including me.
Who caused it? A zillion little cellphone vendors sprung up to take unethical advantage of a poorly regulated, poorly controlled program. In 2009, the FCC began to police this abuse, but it's apparently still out of control.
Shouldn't your anger be directed at a business environment that allows these companies to exercise such unethical greed and profit at your expense? Don't you want the right controls and the right regulations in place to stop these fly-by-night operators?
Do you want government regulations to control this?
Or is your Obama-hate so overpowering that you can't think straight?
. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You cannot download files in this forum
|
|
|