View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
dllee
Joined: 03 Jul 2009 Posts: 5328 Location: East Bay
|
Posted: Thu May 09, 2013 3:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Changing anything that works is ALWAYS a bad thing, will cause other bad things.
Just ignore the low ZERO readings, and the graph works fine. Can you guys (not addressing Mike) really be so anal as to need to read the absolute LOW's in the graph? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mac
Joined: 07 Mar 1999 Posts: 17744 Location: Berkeley, California
|
Posted: Thu May 09, 2013 3:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Anal? Windsurfers,where a cm matters? Perhaps. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dllee
Joined: 03 Jul 2009 Posts: 5328 Location: East Bay
|
Posted: Thu May 09, 2013 4:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Believe it or not.....
I"ve gotten maybe 15 opinions on the schitzoid graph.
5 girls totally berserked by it.
3 guys complained of it.
7 guys say they noticed it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
timwnitram
Joined: 03 Aug 2002 Posts: 130
|
Posted: Thu May 09, 2013 9:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think actually the Berkeley sensor has gotten way more accurate. I had an amazing day today on a 4.2 88ltr board and it read 24-26avg. In the old days this reading would be hopelessly optimistic and I would've been on a 4.8 at least.
Nice job iWS. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
koogzah
Joined: 06 Jul 2005 Posts: 530 Location: right here
|
Posted: Thu May 09, 2013 10:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
windfind wrote: | There is also an issue with the vane which will not impact the speed readings. |
There is also a fundamental issue with the wind at Berkeley which will impact one's ability to sail with anything other than very large slalom gear. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You can attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
|
|