View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
phazle5499
Joined: 06 Oct 2015 Posts: 104
|
Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2012 1:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
"CGNSA does not apply, this is in Urban Exempt "
right you are puppydog. but that doesn't exempt a developer from the requirements of the clean water act, the environmental species act, set backs from the high water mark of the columbia river or appeals to LUBa. And I believe all of these things help to keep the gorge "scenic". |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jsampiero
Joined: 20 Jun 2006 Posts: 677
|
Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2012 2:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Phazle,
Did you ever windsurf? Do you still windsurf? _________________ __________________________________________
FORMERLY of www.windsurfingmag.com
My personal website: www.youneedjosh.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
phazle5499
Joined: 06 Oct 2015 Posts: 104
|
Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2012 2:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Translantic writes:
"phazzle do you even know what the boat basin was used for ten years ago? "
Yeah. 10 years ago the boat basin was dormant. Nichols Boat works closed its doors sometime around 2000, or shortly thereafter. What do you think the boat basin was used for 10 years ago? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
phazle5499
Joined: 06 Oct 2015 Posts: 104
|
Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2012 3:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
"Phazle,
Did you ever windsurf? Do you still windsurf"
___________________
A little OT there jsampiero, but yep did and do. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mikephillips2011
Joined: 09 Jun 2012 Posts: 32
|
Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2012 7:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
phazle5499 wrote: | "Phazle,
Did you ever windsurf? Do you still windsurf"
___________________
A little OT there jsampiero, but yep did and do. |
Phazle,
Do you get into the straps front or back foot first? Which foot do you step on the board with when waterstarting? I can't figure out yet if you are a good guy or a bad guy so answering these questions will help me get a handle on you. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
CUSalin
Joined: 11 Mar 2001 Posts: 405 Location: Hood River, OR
|
Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2012 10:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
Notable, interesting, and informative (but possible sleep inducing) discussion on settlement vs., adjudication and public vs., confidential proceedings to settle legal disputes in and out of court.
Read at your own risk :
http://www.biicl.org/files/1669_dor%C3%83%C2%A9,_laurie_kratky.pdf
Fact is, this is our system, like it or not. _________________ CU Sailin' |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mikephillips2011
Joined: 09 Jun 2012 Posts: 32
|
Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2012 11:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
CUSalin wrote: | Notable, interesting, and informative (but possible sleep inducing) discussion on settlement vs., adjudication and public vs., confidential proceedings to settle legal disputes in and out of court.
|
It takes a law professor over 400 pages to try to convince me to embrace secret backroom deals? Something tells me the argument is a little bit convoluted. How about just using common sense? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
isobars
Joined: 12 Dec 1999 Posts: 20936
|
Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2012 2:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
How's common sense going to work in even just a little town, let alone over 50 states and 320 million issues?
Whose common sense, yours or mine? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
puppydog
Joined: 11 Jul 2008 Posts: 86
|
Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2012 3:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Laws are for those who do not have common sense |
|
Back to top |
|
|
CUSalin
Joined: 11 Mar 2001 Posts: 405 Location: Hood River, OR
|
Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2012 6:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mikephillips2011 wrote: | CUSalin wrote: | Notable, interesting, and informative (but possible sleep inducing) discussion on settlement vs., adjudication and public vs., confidential proceedings to settle legal disputes in and out of court.
|
It takes a law professor over 400 pages to try to convince me to embrace secret backroom deals? Something tells me the argument is a little bit convoluted. How about just using common sense? |
Not trying to "convince," Mikephillips - but rather to "inform." Paper makes good arguments for both settlements and adjudication, and for both public and confidential proceedings.
If your preference is to employ what is most "common," sensible, then confidential settlement proceedings are in order. As the paper discusses, like it or not, .confidential proceedings are how matters such as these are settled in the overwhelmingly greatest number of circumstances.
We can argue about the system, but that is a topic we are not going to resolve here.
Personally, I would prefer settlement proceedings to be more transparent, but really to what end? Just to satisfy my curiosity? I'm more interested in the results, which I believe The Friends attorney stated he'd agree to make public once achieved. _________________ CU Sailin' |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You can attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
|
|