View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
PeconicPuffin
Joined: 07 Jun 2004 Posts: 1830
|
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2012 2:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Unless you plan to sail heavily overpowered with this sail, a race sail is not what you want. I would worry less about the luff v boom length particulars than the overall design.
DelmarEdward wrote: | my suspicion was that it would be the shorter aspect sail would give more lift, if only with deeper camber(less outhaul).
I have looked through previous years on the Sailworks site, and boom lengths have gotten shorter.
There were some blurbs on the Maui Sails forum about this topic in connection with North Sails race sails, and it seemed to me the gist of it was that at least those lower aspect race sails weren't well liked.
I guess the reason I'm asking is i've looked at Aerotech sails, and the 2 cam RapidFire in the 11 size has a longer boom length than the VMG or their 6 cam race sail. I e-mailed them and they said at least some of the difference was due to the boom cutout size, but the difference is substantial. I am thinking the Rapid Fire may plane earlier, but not have the range and top end that the race sail has, which i care less about, sailing in a low wind area. What do you think? |
_________________ Michael
http://www.peconicpuffin.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
techno900
Joined: 28 Mar 2001 Posts: 4161
|
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2012 2:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I can't speak for other brands, but Maui Sails, almost all of their lines have been moving to shorter masts and longer booms.
This includes the race sails, but they are cut away at the tip/bottom of the leach so shorter booms can be used. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
adywind
Joined: 08 Jan 2012 Posts: 665
|
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2012 4:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Before you dump your money for a "half" cambered sail please read this article: http://www.point-7.com/downloads/tests/Boards-June2011.pdf
It absolutely reflects my own dissapointing experience with 2 and 3 cambered sails from different brands. Long story short ,I'm replacing my quiver with RAFs and so far I'm very happy . I plane earlier , jibe smoother, go faster and when I start getting overpowered, I just switch to a smaller rig and board instead of playng a hero like before beeing on a 2 sizes bigger sail then everybody else and destroying my limbs in the process.
If you race -go for the real race ones, if not -choose the light, fun stuff...is my new philosophy |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DelmarEdward
Joined: 05 Aug 2012 Posts: 72
|
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2012 4:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
nice article adywind. Ive thought about a comparing a Retro 9.5 vs my NX 9.9.
Maybe I can pick one up used. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dllee
Joined: 03 Jul 2009 Posts: 5328 Location: East Bay
|
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2012 5:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Pure low end favors long booms.
Pure top end favors shorter booms so the draft stays locked in place.
Some sails have long booms with good low end and good high end, like NP Race sails.
The manufacturers are torn between shorter booms for a light feel, and longer booms for earlier planing.
Nobody knows for sure. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
carl
Joined: 25 Feb 1997 Posts: 2674 Location: SF bay area
|
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2012 5:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Most race sails in the 9,5 range are designed to go fast and go upwind when overpowered. Usually freeride sails have more power. Longer booms = more draft = more power. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dllee
Joined: 03 Jul 2009 Posts: 5328 Location: East Bay
|
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2012 5:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, freeride sails usually have more power than race sails for early planing because they are lighter in weight, the draft is not as locked to the front, with the battens being softer and the sail not quite as seam shaped.
But for direct luffl lengths vs low or top end, it's still up in the air and different manufacterers are different thru the years. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
isobars
Joined: 12 Dec 1999 Posts: 20935
|
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2012 6:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
DelmarEdward wrote: | What do you think? |
I think you've just changed questions. Your original question stated "everything but aspect ratio being equal". Changing brands and models and features and technologies changes everything. It sounds like your question should have been something like "What sail brand and model will get me planing earliest for a given number of square meters?"
Last edited by isobars on Fri Sep 28, 2012 8:52 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
U2U2U2
Joined: 06 Jul 2001 Posts: 5467 Location: Shipsterns Bluff, Tasmania. Colorado
|
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2012 7:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
the original question was longer luff or boom length preference
the discussion now involves cams and race VS non cammed sails, low end, top end early planing et all
so will now evolve into a personal sail preference
too bad _________________ K4 fins
4Boards....May the fours be with you
http://www.k4fins.com/fins.html
http://4boards.co.uk/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dllee
Joined: 03 Jul 2009 Posts: 5328 Location: East Bay
|
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2012 8:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Think we should read original question again.
Longer boom makes sense for low end in the sense more power is in your hands to deal with.
Taller sail makes sense in that more wind is up top, but sails are twisted off up top nowadaze.
So, taller masts and longer booms makes the most sense for early planing in light winds and light conditions for the sail you picked. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You can attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
|
|